HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Author home page(s): Francesco Onorati Antonio Esposito Francesco Pezzo Antonio di Virgilio Pasquale Mastroroberto Attilio Renzulli Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Onorati, F. Articles by Renzulli, A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Onorati, F. Articles by Renzulli, A. Related Collections Coronary disease

---

Original Articles: Cardiovascular

Hospital Outcome Analysis After Different Techniques of Left Internal Mammary Grafts Harvesting

Cardiac Surgery Unit, Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro, Naples, Italy

Accepted for publication June 6, 2007.

^_* Address correspondence to Dr Onorati, Viale dei Pini, 28, Napoli, 80131, Italy (Email: frankono{at}libero.it).

Background: Although accepted worldwide as the first-choice conduit for myocardial revascularization (coronary artery bypass graft surgery), it is still questionable if left internal mammary arteries (LIMAs) do better as pedicled or skeletonized grafts. Recent reports have suggested that the skeletonized technique improves the outcomes.

Methods: In all, 516 consecutive isolated coronary artery bypass graft surgery patients admitted between January 2003 and February 2007 were grouped according to the harvesting technique of LIMAs (387 pedicled versus 129 skeletonized). Intraoperative transit time flow results, hospital outcome, perioperative troponin I leakage, and echocardiographic results were analyzed. Maximum, mean, and minimum flows, pulsatility index, and graft flow reserve were stratified according to the type of surgery (on pump and off pump) and subgroups at risk (severe left ventricular hypertrophy).

Results: The transit time flow results were unsatisfactory in 4 patients (0.8%), all 4 of whom underwent redo anastomosis. Maximum, mean, and minimum flows and pulsatility index values were comparable between skeletonized and pedicled LIMAs (p = not significant), for both on-pump and off-pump surgeries (p = not significant). Graft flow reserve was comparable between the two groups (p = not significant), as well as transit time flow results in severe ventricular hypertrophy. Troponin leakage, postoperative echocardiographic recovery, and hospital outcome were comparable between the two groups (p = not significant at all time points). Only superficial wound complications proved higher in the pedicled group (2.6% versus skeletonized group: 0%; p = 0.05).

Conclusions: Pedicled LIMA carries a higher risk for minor wound complications. Neverthless, the two techniques showed similar in-vivo functional behavior and hospital outcome. Therefore, there is no reason to prefer one technique over the other.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Foroughi, S.-A. Hassantash, M. Hekmat, A. Bolourian, M. Shahzamani, and Z. Ansari Do Different Techniques of Left Internal Mammary Graft Harvesting Really Affect Hospital Outcome? Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2008; 86(3): 1053 - 1053. [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. Onorati, G. Santarpino, and A. Renzulli Reply Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2008; 86(3): 1053 - 1054. [Full Text] [PDF]