ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Ann Thorac Surg 2007;84:1854-1857. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.07.020
© 2007 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Dov Weissberg
Yael Refaely
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Weissberg, D.
Right arrow Articles by Refaely, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Weissberg, D.
Right arrow Articles by Refaely, Y.
Related Collections
Right arrow Esophagus - other


Original Articles: General Thoracic

Foreign Bodies in the Esophagus

Dov Weissberg, MDa,b,*, Yael Refaely, MDa,b

a Department of Thoracic Surgery, Tel Aviv University Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv
b Department of Thoracic Surgery, E. Wolfson Medical Center, Holon, Israel

Accepted for publication July 9, 2007.

* Address correspondence to Dr Weissberg, 11 Be’eri St, Rehovot, 76352, Israel (Email: dovw{at}post.tau.ac.il).

Background: One third of foreign bodies retained in the gastrointestinal tract are present in the esophagus. Their management depends on the anatomic location, shape and size of the foreign body, and duration of impaction.

Methods: Between 1971 and 2001, 32 patients with foreign bodies in the esophagus were admitted to our service in the Wolfson Medical Center. Their charts were reviewed for preoperative diagnosis, kind and location of foreign body, length of retention, management of patients, complications, and length of hospitalization.

Results: One patient was admitted with perforation of the esophagus. Thirty of the foreign bodies have been extracted at rigid esophagoscopy and two at thoracotomy. There was one complication (tear of esophageal mucosa) and one death.

Conclusions: The presence of a foreign body in the esophagus is a challenging problem. Perforations may result in death. Impaction mandates immediate extraction. Our experience indicates that the use of a rigid esophagoscope is safe and reliable. Based on this experience and that of other authors, we recommend the use of the rigid endoscope as the instrument of choice for extracting foreign bodies from the esophagus. Surgeons in training should be taught rigid esophagoscopy.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 2007 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.