ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Correction (v84,p2139)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Tatjana Fleck
Reinhard Moidl
Ernst Wolner
Martin Grabenwoger
Wilfried Wisser
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fleck, T.
Right arrow Articles by Wisser, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fleck, T.
Right arrow Articles by Wisser, W.
Related Collections
Right arrow Cardiac - other
Right arrow Chest wall

Ann Thorac Surg 2007;84:232-236
© 2007 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons

Original Articles: General Thoracic

Triclosan-Coated Sutures for the Reduction of Sternal Wound Infections: Economic Considerations

Tatjana Fleck, MDa,*, Reinhard Moidl, MDb, Alexander Blacky, MDc, Michael Fleck, MSa, Ernst Wolner, MDa, Martin Grabenwoger, MDb, Wilfried Wisser, MDa

a Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, AKH Vienna, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
b Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, KH Hietzing, Vienna, Austria
c Department of Infection Control, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria

Accepted for publication March 19, 2007.

* Address correspondence to Dr Fleck, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, AKH Vienna, Leitstelle 20A, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, 1090, Austria (Email: tatjana.fleck{at}meduniwien.ac.at).

Background: Sternal wound infections are a major complication after cardiac surgery in terms of morbidity and cost increase. To decrease the incidence of infection, we evaluated triclosan-coated sutures for the closure of the sternal incision, as it is known that most of the surgical site infections are related to the incision site.

Methods: From May to December 2005, a total of 479 patients underwent a cardiac surgical procedure. From those, 103 patients were closed with triclosan-coated suture material (cost per patient $30 [in United States dollars]), whereas the remaining 376 patients had their incision closed with noncoated sutures (cost per patient $21).

Results: During the study period, 24 patients had superficial (n = 10) or deep (n = 14) sternal wound infections (cost per patient $11,200). All those patients were closed with conventional suture material. In the triclosan group, no wound infection or dehiscence was observed during hospital stay and follow-up visits.

Conclusions: Triclosan-coated sutures might be valuable in the reduction of sternal wound infections and avoid the suture being a risk factor for surgical site infections. The increased cost of the coated suture material has to be weighed against the enormous cost of sternal wound infections caused directly by the cost of care as well as indirectly through the loss of economic productivity.






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 2007 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.