ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Alan D.L. Sihoe
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chan, D. T.L.
Right arrow Articles by Cheng, L.-C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chan, D. T.L.
Right arrow Articles by Cheng, L.-C.
Related Collections
Right arrow Lung - other
Right arrowRelated Article

Ann Thorac Surg 2007;84:225-231
© 2007 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons


Original Articles: General Thoracic

Surgical Treatment for Empyema Thoracis: Is Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery "Better" Than Thoracotomy?

Daniel T.L. Chan, MBBSa, Alan D.L. Sihoe, FRCSEd, FCCPa,*, Shun Chan, MBBSb, Dickson S.F. Tsang, MBBSc, Ben Fang, MBBSa, Tak-Wai Lee, FRCSEdb, Lik-Cheung Cheng, FRCSEda

a Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Grantham Hospital, Hong Kong, China
c Department of Radiology, Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
b Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Hong Kong, China

Accepted for publication March 7, 2007.

* Address correspondence to Dr Sihoe, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, The University of Hong Kong, Grantham Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, China (Email: adls1{at}lycos.com).

Background: Operations for empyema thoracis are conventionally performed by open thoracotomy, whereas the video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) approach remains controversial. This study compares the radiologic and functional outcomes of decortication using the two approaches.

Methods: During a 5-year period, 77 consecutive patients underwent decortication for empyema thoracis at two university teaching hospitals. The choice of surgical approach was decided by surgeon preference. Preoperative and postoperative empyema management was the same in all patients. Postoperative radiologic improvements were graded by a radiologist blinded to the approach used. Functional improvements were assessed by a questionnaire-based survey conducted at a mean of 36 months after the surgical procedure.

Results: The VATS approach was used in 41 patients and the thoracotomy approach in 36 patients. Patients in the two groups had similar preoperative demographic and clinical features. No patients required conversion from VATS to thoracotomy or reintervention for empyema. Intraoperative blood loss, duration of chest drain, lengths of hospital stay, and postoperative complication rates were all similar in the two groups. The mean operation time in the VATS group was significantly shorter (2.5 versus 3.8 hours, p < 0.001). Decortication using both approaches gave similar degrees of postoperative radiologic and functional improvements. Of the 42 patients available for follow-up, the 21 who received the VATS approach reported significantly less postoperative pain (p = 0.04), greater satisfaction with the wounds (p < 0.0001), and greater satisfaction with the operation overall (p = 0.006).

Conclusions: VATS allows equally effective decortication for empyema as thoracotomy. However, the VATS approach gives less pain and greater patient acceptance.


Related Article

Invited commentary
Donald Low
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2007 84: 231. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
G. Cardillo, F. Carleo, L. Carbone, M. Di Martino, L. Salvadori, L. Petrella, and M. Martelli
Chronic postpneumonic pleural empyema: comparative merits of thoracoscopic versus open decortication
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., November 1, 2009; 36(5): 914 - 918.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ICVTSHome page
F. Edwin and K. Frimpong-Boateng
eComment: Is video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery really superior to open decortication for empyema thoracis?
Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, July 1, 2009; 9(1): 78 - 78.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ICVTSHome page
C. Casali, E. Susanna Storelli, E. Di Prima, and U. Morandi
Long-term functional results after surgical treatment of parapneumonic thoracic empyema
Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, July 1, 2009; 9(1): 74 - 78.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
D. Low
Invited commentary
Ann. Thorac. Surg., July 1, 2007; 84(1): 231 - 231.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 2007 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.