ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Ayyaz Ali
James C. Halstead
Evelyn Lee
John Dunning
Vincenzo Argano
Steven Tsui
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ali, A.
Right arrow Articles by Tsui, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ali, A.
Right arrow Articles by Tsui, S.
Related Collections
Right arrow Valve disease

Ann Thorac Surg 2007;83:2162-2168
© 2007 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons


Original Articles: Cardiovascular

Early Clinical and Hemodynamic Outcomes After Stented and Stentless Aortic Valve Replacement: Results From a Randomized Controlled Trial

Ayyaz Ali, MRCSa,*, James C. Halstead, MRCSa, Fay Cafferty, MSa, Linda Sharples, PhDa, Fiona Rose, BAa, Evelyn Lee, FRCPa, Rosemary Rusk, MRCPa, John Dunning, FRCSa, Vincenzo Argano, FRCSb, Steven Tsui, MD, FRCSa

a Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Papworth Hospital, Papworth Everard, Cambridge, United Kingdom
b Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Morriston Hospital, Swansea, Wales, United Kingdom

Accepted for publication January 12, 2007.

* Address correspondence to Dr Ali, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Papworth Hospital, Papworth Everard, Cambridge, CB3 8RE, United Kingdom. (Email: ayyaz75{at}gmail.com).

Background: Stentless aortic bioprostheses were shown to be hemodynamically superior to earlier generations of stented bioprostheses. Modern stented valve designs have improved hemodynamics. A prospective randomized controlled trial was undertaken to compare stentless versus modern stented valves. Our aim was to determine any differences in early postoperative clinical and hemodynamic outcomes.

Methods: Patients with severe aortic valve stenosis (n = 161) undergoing aortic valve replacement were randomized intraoperatively to receive either the C-E Perimount (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA) pericardial stented bioprosthesis (n = 81) or the Prima Plus (Edwards Lifesciences) (porcine stentless bioprosthesis (n = 80). Transthoracic echocardiograms were performed at one week and eight weeks postoperatively to assess left ventricular mass (LVM) and transvalvular gradients (TVG).

Results: There were no differences between the two groups in baseline characteristics. Cardiopulmonary bypass and ischemic times were longer in the stentless group. Despite similar native aortic annular diameters, the mean size of the prosthesis used in the stentless group was 2.1 mm (SD = 2.8) larger (p < 0.001). Early (30-day) mortality (stentless 3.7% vs stented 2.5%; p = 0.68) and morbidity was similar between groups. Eight weeks postoperatively, LVM (stentless 199 ± 70 vs stented 204 ± 66 grams; p = 0.32) and TVG decreased in both groups (mean systolic gradient; stentless 10 ± 3 vs stented 10 ± 4 mm Hg; p = 0.54) but there was no significant difference between groups.

Conclusions: Despite longer ischemic times in the stentless group, early postoperative outcomes were similar. Both stented and stentless aortic valve replacement offers excellent hemodynamics and can be achieved with low perioperative mortality.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
H. Gulbins and H. Reichenspurner
Which Patients Benefit From Stentless Aortic Valve Replacement?
Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 2009; 88(6): 2061 - 2068.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ICVTSHome page
P. S. Risteski, S. Martens, A. Rouhollahpour, G. Wimmer-Greinecker, A. Moritz, and M. Doss
Prospective randomized evaluation of stentless vs. stented aortic biologic prosthetic valves in the elderly at five years
Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, April 1, 2009; 8(4): 449 - 453.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
E. Balaras, K.S. Cha, B. P. Griffith, and J. S. Gammie
Treatment of aortic stenosis with aortic valve bypass (apicoaortic conduit) surgery: an assessment using computational modeling.
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., March 1, 2009; 137(3): 680 - 687.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
J. S. Gammie, L. S. Krowsoski, J. M. Brown, P. N. Odonkor, C. A. Young, M. J. Santos, J. S. Gottdiener, and B. P. Griffith
Aortic Valve Bypass Surgery: Midterm Clinical Outcomes in a High-Risk Aortic Stenosis Population
Circulation, September 30, 2008; 118(14): 1460 - 1466.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 2007 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.