HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Author home page(s): Himanshu J. Patel Richard L. Prager G. Michael Deeb Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Patel, H. J. Articles by Deeb, G. M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Patel, H. J. Articles by Deeb, G. M. Related Collections Great vessels

Ann Thorac Surg 2007;83:1628-1634
© 2007 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons

---

Original Articles: Cardiovascular

Survival Benefit of Endovascular Descending Thoracic Aortic Repair for the High-Risk Patient

^a Department of Surgery, University of Michigan Hospitals, Ann Arbor, Michigan
^b Department of Radiology, University of Michigan Hospitals, Ann Arbor, Michigan

Accepted for publication December 29, 2006.

^_* Address correspondence to Dr Patel, Department of Surgery, Section of Cardiac Surgery, 2120 Taubman Center Box 0348, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0348 (Email: hjpatel{at}med.umich.edu).

Presented at the Fifty-third Annual Meeting of the Southern Thoracic Surgical Association, Tucson, AZ, Nov 8–11, 2006.

Background: Despite acceptable results reported with endovascular thoracic aortic repair (TEVAR), recent studies have questioned the merit of repair in asymptomatic patients considered high risk for open surgery. In this group, advanced age or comorbid conditions may reduce life expectancy, thus limiting the benefit of elective aneurysmectomy. This study was conducted to determine whether elective TEVAR improves survival for this cohort.

Methods: Forty-six asymptomatic patients with descending thoracic aortic disease were considered high risk for open surgery for reasons of age of 80 years or older (47.8%) or comorbid conditions (84.8%), and were subsequently evaluated for elective TEVAR. Of these, 21 underwent TEVAR, while another 25 patients were excluded from TEVAR on the basis of unfavorable anatomy or refused intervention.

Results: The mean age of the cohort was 77.0 ± 7.0 years (p = 0.9 between groups). Prevalent comorbid conditions were similar between groups, and included coronary artery disease (p = 1.0), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (p = 1.0), and peripheral vascular disease (p = 0.23). Mean maximum aortic diameter was 6.0 ± 1.4 cm (p = 0.54 between groups). Indications for intervention included fusiform aneurysm (65.2%) and pseudoaneurysm or penetrating ulcer (32.6%). No 30-day mortality was observed after TEVAR. All-cause mortality in the entire cohort was 50%. Median actual time to mortality was different between groups (control, 9.2 months versus TEVAR, 24.9 months; p = 0.01). Life-table analysis demonstrated improved survival for TEVAR at 24 months (p = 0.05).

Conclusions: Although the overall prognosis for the asymptomatic patient with descending thoracic aortic disease at high risk for open surgery is poor, elective endovascular repair improves survival and should be considered a therapeutic option in this setting.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L. Sandrelli, P. Cioffi, and M. Fabbrocini Alternative approach for endovascular treatment of aortic aneurysms. Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 2009; 87(5): 1584 - 1585. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. J. Patel, D. M. Williams, G. R. Upchurch Jr, N. L. Dasika, M. C. Passow, R. L. Prager, and G. M. Deeb A Comparison of Open and Endovascular Descending Thoracic Aortic Repair in Patients Older Than 75 Years of Age Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 2008; 85(5): 1597 - 1604. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]