ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Nikolaos Bonaros
Thomas Schachner
Guy Friedrich
Johannes Bonatti
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Oehlinger, A.
Right arrow Articles by Bonatti, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Oehlinger, A.
Right arrow Articles by Bonatti, J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Coronary disease

Ann Thorac Surg 2007;83:1030-1034
© 2007 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons


Original Articles: Cardiovascular

Robotic Endoscopic Left Internal Mammary Artery Harvesting: What Have We Learned After 100 Cases?

Armin Oehlinger, MD*, Nikolaos Bonaros, MD, Thomas Schachner, MD, Elisabeth Ruetzler, MD, Guy Friedrich, MD, Guenther Laufer, MD, Johannes Bonatti, MD

Departments of Cardiac Surgery and Cardiology, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria

Accepted for publication October 23, 2006.

* Address correspondence to Dr Oehlinger, Department of Cardiac Surgery, Innsbruck Medical University, Anichstrasse 35, Innsbruck A-6020, Austria (Email: armin_oehlinger{at}gmx.at).

Background: The development of robotic devices has recently offered the possibility of performing coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) in a totally endoscopic way. An important step of this procedure is endoscopic harvesting of the left internal mammary artery (LIMA). It was the aim of our study to find factors influencing LIMA harvesting time and to describe the challenges associated with robotic endoscopic LIMA harvesting.

Methods: From June 2001 to December 2005, a total of 100 patients underwent robotically assisted CABG. In all cases, the LIMA was harvested by using the robotic DaVinci device. Coronary artery bypass grafting procedures were completed through sternotomy, minithoracotomy, or in a totally endoscopic fashion.

Results: The median LIMA harvesting time was 48 minutes (19 to 180). A significant learning curve was observed: y (min) = 151 – 26 x ln (x), x = LIMA takedown number, p less than 0.001. Takedown time decreased from 140 minutes in the first 10 cases to 34 minutes in the last 10 cases. There was no independent demographic factor that significantly influenced the LIMA harvesting time. The LIMA takedown time also showed no significant correlation with thorax dimensions. Injury to the LIMA occurred in 3 patients (6%) during the first half of the experience and in 1 patient (2%) during the second half (p = not significant).

Conclusions: Robotic-enhanced LIMA takedown is a prerequisite for totally endoscopic CABG. After passing through a significant learning curve, IMA takedown can be performed safely and within an acceptable time frame. Demography and chest size do not seem to influence IMA harvesting time. The rate of LIMA injuries is within the limits of conventional thoracoscopic harvesting.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 2007 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.