HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Author home page(s): J. Scott Rankin Andrew S. Wechsler Donald D. Glower Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Rankin, J. S. Articles by Califf, R. M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Rankin, J. S. Articles by Califf, R. M. Related Collections Congestive Heart Failure

Ann Thorac Surg 2007;83:1008-1015
© 2007 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons

---

Original Articles: Cardiovascular

Techniques and Benefits of Multiple Internal Mammary Artery Bypass at 20 Years of Follow-Up

^a Centennial Heart Center, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee
^b Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
^c Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

Accepted for publication October 13, 2006.

^_* Address correspondence to Dr Rankin, 320 Lynnwood Blvd, Nashville, TN 37205 (Email: jsrankinmd{at}cs.com).

Presented at the Forty-second Annual Meeting of The Society of Thoracic Surgeons, Chicago, IL, Jan 30–Feb 1, 2006.

Background: In patients with multivessel coronary artery disease, performing multiple internal mammary artery (MIMA) grafts to two coronary systems during coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) improves clinical outcome. Few databases have decades of follow-up, however, and the optimal configuration is still in question. The purpose of this study was to assess 20-year clinical benefits of MIMA grafting and to evaluate the possible effects of two different MIMA configurations.

Methods: From 1984 to 1986, 867 patients with multivessel coronary disease underwent CABG. Single (SIMA) IMA grafts were used in 490 and multiple (MIMA) IMA grafts in 377, along with concomitant saphenous veins. Generally, MIMAs were placed to the two largest coronary systems. Among baseline characteristics, only smoking, diabetes, and hypertension were significantly higher for MIMA versus SIMA. Multivariable Cox model analysis was used to assess outcome differences between groups.

Results: During a median follow-up of 20 years, the composite of mortality, myocardial infarction, percutaneous coronary intervention, and redo CABG was significantly reduced after MIMA versus SIMA (p = 0.013). Event-free survival was extended by almost 1 year (p = 0.018), and redo CABG was reduced by 59% (p = 0.005). A comparison within the MIMA group was made between 235 patients receiving IMA grafts to left anterior descending/left circumflex territories versus 122 with grafts to left anterior descending/right coronary artery systems. No significant difference in composite outcome was observed between these configurations (p = 0.88).

Conclusions: These data confirm the clinical benefits of MIMA grafting in multivessel coronary disease to 20 years of follow-up. As long as MIMAs are placed to the two largest coronary systems, no significant differences in long-term results are evident between left anterior descending/left circumflex and left anterior descending/right coronary artery configurations.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. Tatoulis, B. F. Buxton, J. A. Fuller, M. Meswani, S. Theodore, N. Powar, and R. Wynne Long-term patency of 1108 radial arterial-coronary angiograms over 10 years. Ann. Thorac. Surg., July 1, 2009; 88(1): 23 - 29. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. A. Schwann, A. Zacharias, C. J. Riordan, S. J. Durham, A. S. Shah, and R. H. Habib Sequential radial artery grafts for multivessel coronary artery bypass graft surgery: 10-year survival and angiography results. Ann. Thorac. Surg., July 1, 2009; 88(1): 31 - 39. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Zacharias, T. A. Schwann, C. J. Riordan, S. J. Durham, A. S. Shah, and R. H. Habib Late Results of Conventional Versus All-Arterial Revascularization Based on Internal Thoracic and Radial Artery Grafting Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 2009; 87(1): 19 - 26. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Bottio, V. Tarzia, G. Rizzoli, and G. Gerosa Total arterial revascularization, conventional coronary artery bypass surgery, and age cut-off for the loss of benefit from bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., January 1, 2009; 35(1): 191 - 191. [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Glineur, C. Hanet, A. Poncelet, W. D'hoore, J.-C. Funken, J. Rubay, J. Kefer, P. Astarci, V. Lacroix, R. Verhelst, et al. Comparison of Bilateral Internal Thoracic Artery Revascularization Using In Situ or Y Graft Configurations: A Prospective Randomized Clinical, Functional, and Angiographic Midterm Evaluation Circulation, September 30, 2008; 118(14_suppl_1): S216 - S221. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Daemen, N. Kukreja, P. W. Serruys, A. Abbate, M. J. Lipinski, K. J. Harjai, A. C.C. Ng, L. Kritharides, J. H. Burack, and E. L. Hannan Drug-Eluting Stents vs. Coronary-Artery Bypass Grafting N. Engl. J. Med., June 12, 2008; 358(24): 2641 - 2644. [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. A. Schwann, A. Zacharias, C. J. Riordan, S. J. Durham, A. S. Shah, and R. H. Habib Does radial use as a second arterial conduit for coronary artery bypass grafting improve long-term outcomes in diabetics? Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., May 1, 2008; 33(5): 914 - 923. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. H. Jones The Year in Cardiovascular Surgery J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 29, 2008; 51(17): 1707 - 1718. [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Martinez-Sanz, R. de la Llana, I. Nassar, and P. Garrido Use of Both Internal Thoracic Arteries in Diabetic Patients Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2008; 85(2): 690 - 690. [Full Text] [PDF]