HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Author home page(s): John R. Roberts Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Roberts, J. R. Articles by Wadsworth, J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Roberts, J. R. Articles by Wadsworth, J. Related Collections Mediastinum

Ann Thorac Surg 2007;83:388-392
© 2007 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons

---

Original Articles: General Thoracic

Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve Monitoring During Mediastinoscopy: Predictors of Injury

The Surgical Clinic, The Sarah Cannon Cancer Center, Nashville, Tennessee

Accepted for publication March 31, 2006.

^_* Address correspondence to Dr Roberts, 2400 Patterson Street, Suite 309, Nashville, TN 37203 (Email: roberts{at}tsclinic.com).

Presented at the Fortieth Annual Meeting of The Society of Thoracic Surgeons, San Antonio, TX, Jan 26–28, 2004.

BACKGROUND: Recurrent nerve injuries occur during mediastinoscopy despite assiduous technique. We evaluated mediastinoscopy by monitoring laryngeal nerve stimulation during the surgery. These techniques utilize sensing electrodes on laryngeal masks to evaluate stimulus of the larynx, and are used to identify recurrent nerves during redo neck surgery.

METHODS: Fifteen patients were monitored during the entire mediastinoscopy. The laryngeal sensor was placed just before intubation. All patients had a suprasternal incision, digital dissection along the anterior wall of the trachea, and harvest of the nodes in the left paratracheal (4L), right paratracheal (4R), and subcarinal (7) positions. Cautery was used when needed in the subcarinal space and the right paratracheal groove.

RESULTS: Surprisingly, 14 of 15 patients demonstrated intense recurrent nerve stimulation during digital dissection along the anterior wall of the trachea. This dissection activated the right and left recurrent nerves. Though the use of cautery on the left caused significant laryngeal nerve activity, cautery in the subcarinal space and on the right caused very little activity. One patient was found to have a (transient) recurrent nerve injury after surgery. She demonstrated intense activity both during dissection along the anterior wall of the trachea, and during removal of a left paratracheal node.

CONCLUSIONS: Our data demonstrate that traction in the anterior mediastinum causes the greatest stimulation to the nerves, even greater than direct stimulation with current. Thus, these data suggest that injuries could result only from traction. Traction on both recurrent nerves can occur with dissection along the trachea. Laryngeal nerve monitoring can be used to direct biopsies in the left paratracheal groove.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. Zhao, H. Xu, W. Li, L. Chen, D. Zhong, and Y. Zhou Intraoperative recurrent laryngeal nerve monitoring during surgery for left lung cancer J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., September 1, 2010; 140(3): 578 - 582. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]