HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Author home page(s): Motomi Shiono Mitsumasa Hata Akira Sezai Nanao Negishi Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Shiono, M. Articles by Negishi, N. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Shiono, M. Articles by Negishi, N. Related Collections Great vessels

Ann Thorac Surg 2006;82:1665-1669
© 2006 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons

---

Original Articles: Cardiovascular

Validity of a Limited Ascending and Hemiarch Replacement for Acute Type A Aortic Dissection

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Nihon University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan

Accepted for publication May 25, 2006.

^_* Address correspondence to Dr Shiono, Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Nihon University School of Medicine, 30-1 Oyaguchi-kamimachi, Itabashi-ku, Tokyo 173-8610, Japan (Email: mshiono{at}med.nihon-u.ac.jp).

BACKGROUND: The extent of arch repair at emergency surgery for acute type A dissection is controversial. This study was designed to evaluate the rationale of tear-oriented conservative ascending/hemiarch replacement, comparing it against total arch replacement.

METHODS: A total of 134 consecutive patients with acute type A dissection who underwent emergency surgery between 1995 and 2005 were reviewed.

RESULTS: The median age was 68 years (range, 19 to 90); the patients were 62 men and 72 women. The extent of aortic resection included the ascending aorta and hemiarch in 105 patients (group AH) and the total aortic arch in 29 patients (group TA). The hospital mortality rates in groups AH and TA were 6.7% and 6.9%, respectively. The actuarial survival rates were 77.4% (AH) and 80.8% (TA) after 5 years, and 63.5% (AH) and 80.8% (TA) after 10 years. The freedom rates from reoperation were 91.3% (AH) and 88.0% (TA) after 5 years, and 60.9% (AH) and 76.6% (TA) after 10 years. Multivariate analysis indicated that predictors of reoperation were Marfan syndrome and aortic valve regurgitation.

CONCLUSIONS: Limited ascending/hemiarch replacement did not increase the risk of reoperation and would not compromise late results.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				N. T. Kouchoukos, P. Masetti, M. C. Mauney, M. C. Murphy, and C. F. Castner One-Stage Repair of Extensive Chronic Aortic Dissection Using the Arch-First Technique and Bilateral Anterior Thoracotomy Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 2008; 86(5): 1502 - 1509. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. S. Krahenbuhl, F. F. Immer, M. Stalder, L. Englberger, F. S. Eckstein, J. Schmidli, and T. P. Carrel Technical advances improved outcome in patients undergoing surgery of the ascending aorta and/or aortic arch: ten years experience Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., September 1, 2008; 34(3): 595 - 599. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Karck and H. Kamiya Progress of the treatment for extended aortic aneurysms; is the frozen elephant trunk technique the next standard in the treatment of complex aortic disease including the arch? Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., June 1, 2008; 33(6): 1007 - 1013. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]