ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Mahesh S. Sharma
Victor O. Morell
Sanjiv K. Gandhi
Peter D. Wearden
Robert L. Kormos
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sharma, M. S.
Right arrow Articles by Kormos, R. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sharma, M. S.
Right arrow Articles by Kormos, R. L.
Related Collections
Right arrow Mechanical Circulatory Assistance
Right arrow Transplantation - heart

Ann Thorac Surg 2006;82:926-932
© 2006 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons

Original article: Cardiovascular

Ventricular Assist Device Support in Children and Adolescents as a Bridge to Heart Transplantation

Mahesh S. Sharma, MD*, Steven A. Webber, MD, Victor O. Morell, MD, Sanjiv K. Gandhi, MD, Peter D. Wearden, MD, Julianne R. Buchanan, MS, Robert L. Kormos, MD

Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, The University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

Accepted for publication February 27, 2006.

* Address correspondence to Dr Sharma, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, 200 Lothrop St, Suite C-700 PUH, Pittsburgh, PA 15213. (Email: sharmams{at}upmc.edu).

BACKGROUND: Mechanical circulatory support using ventricular assist devices (VADs) is a life-saving option for children in heart failure refractory to maximal medical management. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of standard adult VADs in adolescents and children as well as report our early experience with miniaturized VADs in small children.

METHODS: A 15-year retrospective review was performed on all patients younger than 18 years of age undergoing insertion of a pulsatile VAD at our institution.

RESULTS: Eighteen patients underwent VAD placement during the study period. The mean age was 12 (range, 6 months to 18 years), with a mean body surface area of 1.48 (range, 0.25 to 2.3 m2). Diagnoses included dilated cardiomyopathy (n = 15), myocarditis (n = 2), and postcardiotomy ventricular failure (n = 1). Ten children underwent insertion of biventricular VADs, and 8 had implantation of left ventricular VADs. The mean support duration was 57 days (range, 2 to 175 days). Complications included bleeding requiring reoperation (n = 4), stroke (n = 5), and device-related infection (n = 2). Outcomes of VAD support were as follows: VAD explantation in 1 case, death while receiving mechanical support in 3 patients, and successful transplantation in 14 patients (77%). Survival at 6 months after orthotopic heart transplantation was 93% with 1-year and 5-year survival rates of 83%.

CONCLUSIONS: Currently available VADs are applicable for use as a bridge to orthotopic heart transplantation or in rare instances for myocardial recovery. The increasing accessibility of miniaturized devices allow for long-term support in smaller children and infants while awaiting orthotopic heart transplantation. Although the perioperative morbidity and mortality of VAD placement is not insignificant, survival for those who receive a heart transplant is excellent.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Circ Heart FailHome page
M. L. Stein, R. Robbins, A. A. Sabati, O. Reinhartz, C. Chin, E. Liu, D. Bernstein, S. Roth, G. Wright, B. Reitz, et al.
Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (INTERMACS)-Defined Morbidity and Mortality Associated With Pediatric Ventricular Assist Device Support at a Single US Center: The Stanford Experience
Circ Heart Fail, November 1, 2010; 3(6): 682 - 688.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Interact CardioVasc Thorac SurgHome page
K. Januszewska, E. Malec, J. Birnbaum, M. Loeff, R. Sodian, C. Schmitz, H. Netz, and B. Reichart
Ventricular assist device as a bridge to heart transplantation in children
Interact CardioVasc Thorac Surg, November 1, 2009; 9(5): 807 - 810.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
W. T. Mahle, G. Ianucci, R. N. Vincent, and K. R. Kanter
Costs Associated With Ventricular Assist Device Use in Children
Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 2008; 86(5): 1592 - 1597.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 CirculationHome page
S. K. Gandhi, C. B. Huddleston, D. T. Balzer, D. J. Epstein, T. A. Boschert, and C. E. Canter
Biventricular Assist Devices as a Bridge to Heart Transplantation in Small Children
Circulation, September 30, 2008; 118(14_suppl_1): S89 - S93.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
P. N. Ruygrok, D. S. Esmore, P. M. Alison, K. A. Finucane, S. P. McGuinness, A. D. McGeorge, J. Negri, K. Jones, and H. C. Gibbs
Pediatric Experience With the VentrAssist LVAD
Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 2008; 86(2): 622 - 626.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
B. W. Duncan
Invited commentary.
Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2006; 82(3): 933 - 933.
[Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 2006 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.