|
|
||||||||
Ann Thorac Surg 2006;82:44-50
© 2006 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
a Department of Cardiac Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliera di Perugia, Perugia, Italy
b Department of Imaging Diagnostics, AUSL 2, Assisi, Italy
c Radiology Institute, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy
Accepted for publication March 7, 2006.
* Address correspondence to Dr Di Lazzaro, S. C. di Cardiochirurgia, Ospedale R. Silvestrini, S. Andrea delle fratte 06156 Perugia, Italy (Email: davide.dilazzaro{at}ospedale.perugia.it).
BACKGROUND: The standard invasive procedure to evaluate graft patency is selective coronary angiography. The recent introduction of a new generation of multidetector row computed tomography made possible the noninvasive study of grafts with excellent results in terms of visualization and resolution. We used computed tomography to study all patients with a radial artery graft operated on in 2002.
METHODS: Between April and October 2005, we reviewed all patients operated on by coronary artery bypass grafting at our institution between January and December 2002. A total of 62 patients received a radial artery graft. Of these, 22 were lost at the time of follow-up. The other 40 patients were enrolled for a multidetector row computed tomography study. Demographic and instrumental data were collected for all the patients. A total number of 145 grafts were studied, with complete and excellent visualization.
RESULTS: The scans revealed a 97.77% (44 of 45) patency rate for left internal mammary arteries, 90.57% (48 of 53) for vein grafts, and 73.91% (34 of 46) for radial arteries (mammary artery plus vein grafts versus radial artery patency, p < 0.001). If analyzed for target vessel, we found the poorest result of radial grafts when placed on the right coronary artery (40% [2 of 5] patency rate).
CONCLUSIONS: Noninvasive control of previously bypassed patients is feasible, with no discomfort for them and excellent visualization of grafts. The use of the radial artery as a conduit for bypass graft can be achieved with good results, after a careful choice of the target vessel.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. Collins, C. M. Webb, C. F. Chong, N. E. Moat, and for the Radial Artery Versus Saphenous Vein Patenc Radial Artery Versus Saphenous Vein Patency Randomized Trial: Five-Year Angiographic Follow-Up Circulation, June 3, 2008; 117(22): 2859 - 2864. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. J. Gibbons, P. A. Araoz, and E. E. Williamson The Year in Cardiac Imaging J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 4, 2007; 50(10): 988 - 1003. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |