|
|
||||||||
Ann Thorac Surg 2006;81:1599-1604
© 2006 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
a Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Siyami Ersek Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Center, Istanbul, Turkey
b Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery Department, OLV Clinic, Aalst, Belgium
Accepted for publication December 2, 2005.
* Address correspondence to Dr Casselman, Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery Department, OLV Clinic, Moorselbaan 164, Aalst 9300, Belgium (Email: filip.casselman{at}olvz-aalst.be).
BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement through partial upper sternotomy has been shown to reduce surgical trauma, and, supposedly, decrease postoperative pain, blood loss, and hospital stay.
METHODS: From October 1997 until November 2004, 506 patients received isolated aortic valve replacement, of which 232 underwent the minimal access J-sternotomy approach (group 1). The control group (group 2) consisted of 274 patients who underwent aortic valve replacements by median sternotomy. We retrospectively reviewed outcomes of the patients in the early follow-up period.
RESULTS: In group 1 and group 2, respectively, early mortality was 2.6% (6 patients) and 4.4% (12 patients). The minimal access group had reduced aortic cross-clamp and cardiopulmonary bypass times compared with conventional group: 61.8 ± 16.6 versus 69.5 ± 16.6 minutes (p < 0.05) and 88.8 ± 23.2 versus 100.2 ± 22.6 minutes (p < 0.05), respectively. Mean blood loss was lower in group 1 compared with group 2 (p < 0.05). Intensive care unit and hospital stays were shorter in the minimal access group: 2.1 ± 2.5 versus 2.5 ± 5.3 days (p = nonsignificant) and 10.8 ± 7.1 versus 12.8 ± 10.6 days (p < 0.05), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Aortic valve replacement can be performed safely through a partial upper sternotomy on a routine basis for isolated aortic valve disease.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Tabata, R. Umakanthan, L. H. Cohn, R. M. Bolman III, P. S. Shekar, F. Y. Chen, G. S. Couper, and S. F. Aranki Early and late outcomes of 1000 minimally invasive aortic valve operations Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., April 1, 2008; 33(4): 537 - 541. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. K. Rosengart, T. Feldman, M. A. Borger, T. A. Vassiliades Jr, A. M. Gillinov, K. J. Hoercher, A. Vahanian, R. O. Bonow, and W. O'Neill Percutaneous and Minimally Invasive Valve Procedures: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association Council on Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia, Council on Clinical Cardiology, Functional Genomics and Translational Biology Interdisciplinary Working Group, and Quality of Care and Outcomes Research Interdisciplinary Working Group Circulation, April 1, 2008; 117(13): 1750 - 1767. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Murtuza, J. R. Pepper, R. DeL Stanbridge, C. Jones, C. Rao, A. Darzi, and T. Athanasiou Minimal Access Aortic Valve Replacement: Is It Worth It? Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 2008; 85(3): 1121 - 1131. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Boehm, P. Libera, A. Will, S. Martinoff, and S. M. Wildhirt Partial Median "I" Sternotomy: Minimally Invasive Alternate Approach for Aortic Valve Replacement Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2007; 84(3): 1053 - 1055. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. L. Nagy and A. Peterffy Minimally Invasive Aortic Valve Replacement: A Word of Caution Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2007; 84(3): 1071 - 1071. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. P. Casselman, I. Bakir, F. Wellens, I. Degrieck, F. Van Praet, and H. Vanermen Reply Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2007; 84(3): 1071 - 1072. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Glauber, A. Farneti, M. Solinas, and J. Karimov Aortic valve replacement through a right minithoracotomy MMCTS, November 10, 2006; 2006(1110): 1826. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |