|
|
||||||||
Ann Thorac Surg 2006;81:1396-1400
© 2006 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
a Department of Cardiac Surgery, University of Parma, Italy
b Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Parma, Italy
c Department of Anesthesiology, University of Parma, Italy
d Biochemical Analysis Laboratory, Ospedale Maggiore of Parma, Parma, Italy
Accepted for publication October 17, 2005.
* Address correspondence to Dr Nicolini, Cattedra e Divisione di Cardiochirurgia, Università degli Studi, Via A. Gramsci 14, Parma 43100, Italy (Email: francesconicolini{at}libero.it).
BACKGROUND: We studied postoperative mortality and morbidity after coronary artery bypass graft surgery performed using the miniextracorporeal circulation (MECC) system.
METHODS: From June 2001 to June 2002, we randomly enrolled 60 patients who underwent isolated elective coronary artery bypass graft surgery, and were operated on with the MECC system (30 patients: group A) or standard cardiopulmonary bypass (30 patients: group B). Serial blood samples were collected to evaluate the main preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative clinical and biological variables; and to measure hemolysis, interleukin-6 cytokine, and plasma C-reactive protein release.
RESULTS: A more stable hemoglobin level was detected in group A. The platelet count did not show a significant difference between the two groups. Interleukin-6 cytokine release showed higher values in group B, although no difference between groups was statistically significant. The time course of circulating plasma C-reactive protein concentration exhibited the same increase in both groups. Plasma free hemoglobin levels showed higher hemolysis peaks in group B, although a statistical significant difference was detected only at 4 hours after surgery. A higher cardiac index and reduced systemic and pulmonary vascular resistance index in the early postoperative period were found in group A at postoperative time 30 minutes.
CONCLUSIONS: Our experience shows that MECC offers satisfactory clinical benefits in terms of good hemodynamic support, safety, and low morbidity, although the study failed to demonstrate a significant clear superiority of MECC versus conventional cardiopulmonary bypass. The results need to be confirmed by a larger prospective, randomized study comparing MECC and standard cardiopulmonary bypass.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. Prasser, M. Abbady, C. Keyl, A. Liebold, M. Tenderich, A. Philipp, and C. Wiesenack Effect of a miniaturized extracorporeal circulation (MECCTMSystem) on liver function Perfusion, July 1, 2007; 22(4): 245 - 250. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Glauber, A. Farneti, S. Bevilacqua, and J. Karimov Pump-assisted beating heart surgery MMCTS, February 19, 2007; 2007(0219): 943. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |