ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Online Discussion
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Brian A. Bruckner
Daniel J. DiBardino
Shanda H. Blackmon
Richard G. Fisher
Kenneth L. Mattox
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bruckner, B. A.
Right arrow Articles by Wall, M. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bruckner, B. A.
Right arrow Articles by Wall, M. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Great vessels

Ann Thorac Surg 2006;81:1339-1346
© 2006 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons

Original article: Cardiovascular

Critical Evaluation of Chest Computed Tomography Scans for Blunt Descending Thoracic Aortic Injury

Brian A. Bruckner, MD a , Daniel J. DiBardino, MD a , Todd C. Cumbie, BS a , Charles Trinh, MD b , Shanda H. Blackmon, MD a , Richard G. Fisher, MD b , Kenneth L. Mattox, MD a , Mathew J. Wall, MD a , *

a Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
b Department of Radiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas

Accepted for publication November 3, 2005.

* Address correspondence to Dr Wall, Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX 77030 (Email: mjwall{at}houston.rr.com).

BACKGROUND: Although aortography has been the long-held "gold standard" for diagnosis of traumatic blunt aortic injury, advances in imaging technology offer less-invasive, more-rapid, and potentially more cost-effective evaluation. The purpose of this study was to review this hospital's experience with the screening and diagnosis of blunt aortic injury with emphasis on the critical evaluation of computed tomography (CT) scans for defining descending thoracic aortic injury.

METHODS: A retrospective single-center analysis of all patients undergoing aortography to evaluate for blunt aortic injury between January 1, 1997, and August 31, 2004, was performed. A policy of relying on CT scans to definitively diagnose blunt aortic injury was not in force, and all patients with positive, equivocal, and negative screening CT scans with significant injury mechanism underwent subsequent aortography; this contributed to an unbiased analysis. A subgroup of patients imaged with the latest generation multislice CT scanners (July 1, 2003, to August 31, 2004) was separately analyzed with rapid three-dimensional reconstruction.

RESULTS: Of 856 aortograms, 206 (24.1%) were preceded by chest CT scan. Of 31 patients with confirmed aortic injury, 20 had undergone CT scan with 16 positive for definite injury, 3 positive for possible injury, and 1 false-negative study. Of the 206 patients scanned, 114 (55.3%) showed possible injury, 76 (36.9%) were negative, and 16 (7.8%) were positive. Only 3 of the 114 with possible injury (2.6%) were true positives whereas 1 of the 76 negative scans (1.3%) was a false negative and all 16 positive scans were true positives. These data for CT scan imaging result in a sensitivity of 95%, a specificity of 40%, a positive predictive value of 15%, and a negative predictive value of 99%.

CONCLUSIONS: Chest CT is an acceptable screening tool based on prerequisite high sensitivity and ease of performance in the trauma patient suspected of having a descending thoracic aortic injury. Although the excellent negative predictive value resulted in an algorithm change at this institution, there were a significant number of equivocal scans that required subsequent aortography. Three-dimensional software reconstruction of the aorta can aid in diagnosing blunt aortic injury when findings are equivocal, but there will continue to be artifacts and limitations that require aortography for clarification.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
S. D. Steenburg and J. G. Ravenel
Acute Traumatic Thoracic Aortic Injuries: Experience with 64-MDCT
Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2008; 191(5): 1564 - 1569.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 RadiologyHome page
S. D. Steenburg, J. G. Ravenel, J. S. Ikonomidis, C. Schonholz, and S. Reeves
Acute Traumatic Aortic Injury: Imaging Evaluation and Management
Radiology, September 1, 2008; 248(3): 748 - 762.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Card Surg AdultHome page
T. G. Gleason and J. E. Bavaria
Trauma to the Great Vessels
Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2008; 3(2008): 1333 - 1354.
[Full Text]

Home page
 ImagingHome page
M R Jones and J H Reid
Emergency chest radiology: thoracic aortic disease and pulmonary embolism
Imaging, September 1, 2006; 18(3): 122 - 138.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
K. E. Maturen and D. M. Williams
Invited commentary
Ann. Thorac. Surg., April 1, 2006; 81(4): 1346 - 1347.
[Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 2006 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.