|
|
||||||||
Ann Thorac Surg 2006;81:555-561
© 2006 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
Division of Cardiac Surgery, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, Maryland
Accepted for publication June 28, 2005.
* Address correspondence to Dr Brown, Division of Cardiac Surgery, University of Maryland Medical Center, N4W94, 22 S Greene St, Baltimore, MD 21201 (Email: jbrown{at}smail.umaryland.edu).
Presented at the Fifty-first Annual Meeting of the Southern Thoracic Surgical Association, Cancun, Mexico, Nov 24, 2004.
BACKGROUND: Debate continues between on-pump or off-pump approach for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). We used off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB) as a tool within a decision-making algorithm driven by the patient-related factors of coronary anatomy and comorbidity. Our analysis presents this decision algorithm and describes outcomes using this approach.
METHODS: From January 2000 to December 2003, 592 consecutive patients undergoing isolated CABG were assigned by one surgeon to a technique: on-pump CABG or OPCAB according to (1) anatomy and (2) predicted risk. Anatomic factors against OPCAB were target vessel size less than 1.25 mm, calcification, poor quality, intramyocardial location, and multiple stenoses. Given that OPCAB could be performed safely, patients in the moderate risk range, ie, those elderly with multiple comorbidities, were preferentially treated using OPCAB.
RESULTS: The OPCAB group had higher predicted 30-day mortality compared with the on-pump CABG group, consistent with the protocol's intent. However, morbidity and mortality were similar between on-pump CABG and OPCAB. The OPCAB patients received the same number of internal mammary artery grafts but fewer distal grafts. Mortality and observed to expected ratios were favorable for both groups and below those The Society of Thoracic Surgeons' predicted for OPCAB.
CONCLUSIONS: Matching surgical strategy to patient-related factors and needs resulted in excellent outcomes. Our data support the use of a protocol based on patient characteristics to drive the surgeon's choice between an on-pump CABG or OPCAB approach. As such, OPCAB can be viewed as a tool to be used by the surgeon developing a best practice in treating coronary artery disease.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. Barandon, P. Richebe, E. Munos, J. Calderon, M. Lafitte, S. Lafitte, T. Couffinhal, and X. Roques Off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery in very high-risk patients: adjustment and preliminary results Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, October 1, 2008; 7(5): 789 - 793. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. C. Grant, Z. Kon, A. Joshi, E. Christenson, S. Kallam, N. Burris, J. Gu, and R. S. Poston Is Aprotinin Safe to Use in a Cohort at Increased Risk for Thrombotic Events: Results From a Randomized, Prospective Trial in Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2008; 86(3): 815 - 822. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Konen, O. Goitein, L. Sternik, Y. Eshet, J. Shemesh, and E. Di Segni The Prevalence and Anatomical Patterns of Intramuscular Coronary Arteries: A Coronary Computed Tomography Angiographic Study J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 6, 2007; 49(5): 587 - 593. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Iida, H. Mori, Y. Sudo, Y. Yamada, K. Eda, and Y. Inoue Graft to coronary artery shunt during off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2006; 82(3): e27 - e28. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |