ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Michael A. Borger
Vivek Rao
Hugh E. Scully
Christopher M. Feindel
Tirone E. David
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Borger, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by David, T. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Borger, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by David, T. E.
Related Collections
Right arrow Valve disease

Ann Thorac Surg 2005;80:2180-2185
© 2005 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons

Original article: Cardiovascular

Stentless Aortic Valves are Hemodynamically Superior to Stented Valves During Mid-Term Follow-Up: A Large Retrospective Study

Michael A. Borger, MD, PhD * , Susan M. Carson, AHT, Joan Ivanov, PhD, Vivek Rao, MD, PhD, Hugh E. Scully, MD, Christopher M. Feindel, MD, Tirone E. David, MD

Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, and Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Accepted for publication May 17, 2005.

* Address correspondence to Dr Borger, Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Toronto General Hospital, Room 4N-451, 200 Elizabeth Street, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5G 2C4 (Email: michael.borger{at}uhn.on.ca).

Presented at the Poster Session of the Forty-first Annual Meeting of The Society of Thoracic Surgeons, Tampa, FL, Jan 24–26, 2005.

BACKGROUND: Several studies have compared left venticular mass (LVM) regression and hemodynamic data for stentless versus stented aortic bioprostheses with conflicting results. The major limitations of these studies are their small sample size and short-term follow-up. We therefore compared midterm LVM regression, hemodynamic data, and survival in a large population of tissue aortic valve replacement (AVR) patients.

METHODS: All patients undergoing tissue AVR at our institution between 1998 and 2001 were included (n = 737). Patients were divided into two groups according to type of bioprosthetic implanted: stentless patients (total n = 310) (Toronto SPV [St Jude Medical, St Paul, MN], n = 146 and Freestyle [Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN], n = 164) and stented patients (total n=427) (Perimount [Edwards Life Sciences Inc, Irvine, CA], n = 291 and Mosaic [Medtronic], n = 136).

RESULTS: The two groups of patients had similar preoperative transvalvular gradients and LVM index (130 ± 47 vs 130 ± 42 g/m2 for stentless versus stented valves, respectively). Predischarge echos revealed that stentless patients had significantly lower mean transvalvular gradients (11 ± 5 vs 15 ± 6 mm Hg, p < 0.001) and larger effective orifice areas (1.32 ± 0.52 vs 1.22 ± 0.48 cm2, p = 0.01). Follow-up echocardiograms were obtained in 99% of surviving patients 28 ± 22 (range, 0–79) months postoperatively. Stentless patients had significantly lower LVM index during follow-up (100 ± 32 vs 107 ± 32 g/m2, p = 0.005) and stentless valves were an independent predictor of LVM regression. Furthermore, a higher proportion of stented patients had residual LV hypertrophy during follow-up (28% vs 18%, p = 0.001). Stentless valves were associated with improved midterm survival by univariate analysis, but not by multivariable analysis.

CONCLUSIONS: Midterm follow-up in a large number of patients reveals that stentless bioprostheses are hemodynamically superior to stented valves.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
H. Gulbins and H. Reichenspurner
Which Patients Benefit From Stentless Aortic Valve Replacement?
Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 2009; 88(6): 2061 - 2068.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 CirculationHome page
D. J. Ruzicka, I. Hettich, A. Hutter, S. Bleiziffer, C. C. Badiu, R. Bauernschmitt, R. Lange, and W. B. Eichinger
The Complete Supraannular Concept: In Vivo Hemodynamics of Bovine and Porcine Aortic Bioprostheses
Circulation, September 15, 2009; 120(11_suppl_1): S139 - S145.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
L. Caprili, A. N. Fahim, C. Zussa, and D. M. Cristell
Very early malfunction of a large stentless aortic valve
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., August 1, 2009; 36(2): 417 - 418.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 MMCTSHome page
T. Carrel
Aortic valve and/or aortic root replacement using an aortic homograft
MMCTS, June 26, 2009; 2009(0626): 3905.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
S. Lehmann, T. Walther, S. Leontyev, J. Kempfert, J. Garbade, M. A. Borger, and F. W. Mohr
The Toronto Root Bioprosthesis: Midterm Results in 186 Patients.
Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 2009; 87(6): 1751 - 1756.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
M. Vicchio, A. Della Corte, L. S. De Santo, M. De Feo, G. Caianiello, M. Scardone, and M. Cotrufo
Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch in the Elderly: Survival, Ventricular Mass Regression, and Quality of Life
Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 2008; 86(6): 1791 - 1797.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 ICVTSHome page
T. Mizuno
Wall rupture of Medtronic Freestyle stentless porcine aortic root bioprosthesis
Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, December 1, 2008; 7(6): 1129 - 1130.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
M. A. Borger
Reply
Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 2008; 86(2): 691 - 692.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
T. E. David, C. M. Feindel, J. Bos, J. Ivanov, and S. Armstrong
Aortic valve replacement with Toronto SPV bioprosthesis: Optimal patient survival but suboptimal valve durability
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., January 1, 2008; 135(1): 19 - 24.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Card Surg AdultHome page
R. F. Padera Jr. and F. J. Schoen
Pathology of Cardiac Surgery
Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2008; 3(2008): 111 - 178.
[Full Text]

Home page
 Card Surg AdultHome page
N. D. Desai and G. T. Christakis
Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve Replacement: Stented Pericardial and Porcine Valves
Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2008; 3(2008): 857 - 894.
[Full Text]

Home page
 ICVTSHome page
A. Kallikourdis and S. Jacob
Is a stentless aortic valve superior to conventional bioprosthetic valves for aortic valve replacement?
Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, October 1, 2007; 6(5): 665 - 672.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Eur Heart JHome page
J. Dunning, R.J. Graham, J. Thambyrajah, M.J. Stewart, S.W.H. Kendall, and S. Hunter
Stentless vs. stented aortic valve bioprostheses: a prospective randomized controlled trial
Eur. Heart J., October 1, 2007; 28(19): 2369 - 2374.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
M. A. Borger, K. Prasongsukarn, S. Armstrong, C. M. Feindel, and T. E. David
Stentless Aortic Valve Reoperations: A Surgical Challenge
Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2007; 84(3): 737 - 744.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
A. D'Onofrio, S. Auriemma, P. Magagna, A. Favaro, A. Cannarella, C. Piccin, M. Bilotta, N. Abbiate, N. Lamascese, and A. Fabbri
Aortic valve replacement with the Sorin Pericarbon Freedom stentless prosthesis: 7 years' experience in 130 patients
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., August 1, 2007; 134(2): 491 - 495.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
M. A. Borger, A. F. Nette, M. Maganti, and C. M. Feindel
Carpentier-Edwards Perimount Magna Valve Versus Medtronic Hancock II: A Matched Hemodynamic Comparison
Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 2007; 83(6): 2054 - 2058.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
T. Bove, Y. Van Belleghem, K. Francois, F. Caes, H. Van Overbeke, and G. Van Nooten
Stentless and stented aortic valve replacement in elderly patients: factors affecting midterm clinical and hemodynamical outcome
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., November 1, 2006; 30(5): 706 - 713.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
M. J. Antunes
Editorial comment: Aortic stenosis in the elderly: rethinking strategies
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., November 1, 2006; 30(5): 713 - 715.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
T. Walther, A. Rastan, V. Falk, S. Lehmann, J. Garbade, A. K. Funkat, F. W. Mohr, and J. F. Gummert
Patient prosthesis mismatch affects short- and long-term outcomes after aortic valve replacement.
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., July 1, 2006; 30(1): 15 - 19.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 2005 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.