ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Simon M. Allen
Adrian J. Marchbank
James Kuo
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zafar, M.
Right arrow Articles by Unsworth-White, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zafar, M.
Right arrow Articles by Unsworth-White, J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Coronary disease

Ann Thorac Surg 2005;80:2162-2165
© 2005 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons

Original article: Cardiovascular

Single-Layer Versus Multiple-Layer Closure of Leg Wounds After Long Saphenous Vein Harvest: A Prospective Randomized Trial

Muhammed Zafar, PhD, Anil John, FRCS * , Zahid Khan, FRCS, Simon M. Allen, FRCS, Adrian J. Marchbank, FRCS, C. Terence Lewis, FRCS, Malcolm J.R. Dalrymple-Hay, PhD, FRCS, James Kuo, FRCS, Jonathan Unsworth-White, FRCS

Southwest Cardiothoracic Centre, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Derriford Hospital, Plymouth, United Kingdom

Accepted for publication May 16, 2005.

* Address correspondence to Dr John, Southwest Cardiothoracic Centre, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Derriford Hospital, Plymouth PL6 8DH, UK (Email: ajohn234{at}hotmail.com).

BACKGROUND: The long saphenous vein harvested by traditional techniques is an important conduit for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). The purpose of this study was to determine if a single-layer closure over a drain improved wound healing compared with the traditional two-layer closure after harvest.

METHODS: Seventy-eight consecutive patients undergoing CABG were prospectively randomized to have their leg wound closed by either a single-layer technique with a suction drain or multiple layers. All wounds were assessed using the additional treatment, presence of serous discharge, erythema, purulent exudate, and separation of the deep tissues, isolation of bacteria, and the duration of inpatient stay (ASEPSIS) score postoperatively and 6 weeks later.

RESULTS: Forty-four patients (5 females) had their wound closed by the single-layer technique and 34 (6 females) closed in multiple layers. The ASEPSIS scores were significantly lower (p = 0.001) in those patients closed with a single layer (mean, 4.4) than those with multiple layers (mean, 6.8). Patients whose legs were closed with the single-layer technique had less peripheral edema compared with the multiple-layer group ({chi}2, p < 0.001). Using univariate analysis there was no correlation between ASEPSIS scores and length of wound incision (p = 0.49), whereas increasing age was found to have a weak positive correlation (r =0.24; p = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS: Single-layer leg wound closure over a suction drain is superior to the traditional multiple-layer closure. A possible mechanism of better wound healing in the former technique might be through decreased tissue handling and a reduction in leg edema.






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 2005 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.