HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Crema, E. Articles by Silva, A. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Crema, E. Articles by Silva, A. A.

Ann Thorac Surg 2005;80:1196-1201
© 2005 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons

---

Original article: General thoracic

Laparoscopic Transhiatal Subtotal Esophagectomy for the Treatment of Advanced Megaesophagus

Department of Digestive Surgery, Federal School of Medicine, Uberaba, Minas Gerais, Brazil

Accepted for publication October 26, 2004.

^_* Address reprint requests to Dr Crema, Rua Marcos Lombardi, 305, 38050-170, Uberaba, Minas Gerais, Brasil (Email: eduardocremafmtm{at}mednet.com.br).

BACKGROUND: Chagas' disease affects about 5 to 8 million individuals in Brazil, with 5% to 8% of them developing megaesophagus. In view of the transformation of the esophagus into an inert tube unable to propel food to the stomach, and in order to prevent complications, the elected treatment for advanced megaesophagus is subtotal esophagectomy. We evaluate here the outcome of laparoscopic transhiatal subtotal esophagectomy in the treatment of advanced megaesophagus.

METHODS: Thirty patients with advanced esophagopathy, 26 with chagasic and 4 with idiopathic megaesophagus, were submitted to transhiatal subtotal esophagectomy without thoracotomy through laparoscopy and left cervicotomy. Contrast exams of the esophagus, stomach, and duodenum (ESD), upper digestive tract endoscopy (UDE), esophageal electromanometry, and 24-hour pHmetry were performed during the preoperative and postoperative period. With respect to the surgical technique, pyloroplasty was not performed. The cervical esophagus was dissected through a left cervicotomy and the esophagogastric anastomosis was performed between the cervical segment of the esophagus and the posterior wall of the stomach.

RESULTS: No death or conversion to open surgery occurred in the present series. Complications were observed in 8 patients (26.7%): 6 cases of pneumothorax (20%), 2 of cervical fistulas (6.7%), 7 of transient dysphonia (23.3%), and 1 of anastomotic esophagogastric stenosis (3.3%). One (3.3%) of the patients developed dysphagia for solid food after 36 months despite normal ESD, UDE, electromanometry, and 24-hour pHmetry.

CONCLUSIONS: The present results show that laparoscopic transhiatal subtotal esophagectomy is a feasible and safe procedure with an excellent postoperative outcome.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				G. del Genio, A. del Genio, L. Brusciano, G. Russo, F. Pizza, F. del Genio, and G. Rossetti Laparoscopic Cardioplasty to Avoid Esophageal Resection in Patient Not Responsive to Heller Myotomy Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 2007; 83(6): 2235 - 2238. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]