ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Antonio Maria Calafiore
Gabriele Di Giammarco
Giovanni Teodori
Valerio Mazzei
Giuseppe Vitolla
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Calafiore, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Contini, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Calafiore, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Contini, M.

Ann Thorac Surg 2005;80:888-895
© 2005 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons


Original article: Cardiovascular

Single Versus Bilateral Internal Mammary Artery for Isolated First Myocardial Revascularization in Multivessel Disease: Long-Term Clinical Results in Medically Treated Diabetic Patients

Antonio Maria Calafiore, MD a , * , Michele Di Mauro, MD b , Gabriele Di Giammarco, MD b , Giovanni Teodori, MD a , Angela Lorena Iacò, MD b , Valerio Mazzei, MD c , Giuseppe Vitolla, MD b , Marco Contini, MD b

a Division of Cardiac Surgery, University Hospital, Torino
b Division of Cardiac Surgery, "G D’Annunzio" University, Chieti
c Division of Cardiac Surgery, Papardo Hospital, Messina, Italy

Accepted for publication March 18, 2005.

* Address reprint requests to Dr Calafiore, Division of Cardiac Surgery, "S Giovanni Battista" Hospital, c.so Bramante 86, Torino, Italy (Email: calafiore{at}unich.it).

BACKGROUND: We evaluated our experience to investigate if the use of bilateral internal mammary artery (BIMA) grafting, with or without complementary saphenous vein grafts (SVG), increases the quality of the results of coronary bypass grafting in medically treated diabetic patients who undergo first myocardial revascularization, when compared with the use of a single left internal mammary artery (LIMA) and SVG.

METHODS: From October 1991 to December 2001, 558 diabetic patients with multivessel coronary disease had first isolated myocardial revascularization using LIMA and SVG (group LIMA) in 217 cases and BIMA ± SVG (group BIMA) in 341. Propensity score analysis identified 400 patients, 200 for each group, with similar preoperative characteristics. Thirty-day outcome and 8-year freedom from death from any cause, cardiac death, acute myocardial infarction (AMI), AMI in a grafted area, redo/percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA), redo/PTCA in a grafted area, target cardiac events, and any event were evaluated. Follow-up ranged from 2.0 to 12.2 years (mean 6.0 ± 2.0).

RESULTS: There was no difference between groups except the cardiac deaths, which were significantly higher in the LIMA group (7 versus 0, p = 0.015). The BIMA group showed better 8-year freedom from death any cause (86.7 ± 3.2 versus 79.5 ± 4.1, p = 0.0274), cardiac death (96.3 ± 1.4 versus 88.4 ± 4.0, p = 0.0406), acute myocardial infarction (99.5 ± 0.5 versus 92.0 ± 3.9, p = 0.0092), and acute myocardial infarction in a grafted area (99.5 ± 0.5 versus 93.4 ± 3.7, p = 0.0204). Cox analysis confirmed that the use of LIMA and SVG was an independent predictor for lower freedom from death (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.8, p = 0.0310), cardiac death (HR = 1.9, p = 0.0426), AMI (HR = 9.7, p = 0.0033) and AMI in a grafted area (HR = 8.2, p = 0.0410).

CONCLUSIONS: In diabetic patients with multivessel disease who undergo first myocardial revascularization, BIMA ± SVG provides higher freedom from death, any cause, and cardiac-related death, if compared with LIMA + SVG. It plays a protective role in reducing the incidence of late AMI.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
G. Nasso, R. Coppola, R. Bonifazi, F. Piancone, G. Bozzetti, and G. Speziale
Arterial revascularization in primary coronary artery bypass grafting: Direct comparison of 4 strategies--results of the Stand-in-Y Mammary Study.
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., May 1, 2009; 137(5): 1093 - 1100.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
P. C. Austin
Propensity-score matching in the cardiovascular surgery literature from 2004 to 2006: a systematic review and suggestions for improvement.
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., November 1, 2007; 134(5): 1128 - 1135.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
A. Azmoun, R. Ramadan, N. Al-Attar, C. Kortas, S. Ghostine, C. Caussin, M.-L. Bourachot, B. Lancelin, M. Slama, and R. Nottin
Exclusive Internal Thoracic Artery Grafting in Triple-Vessel-Disease Patients: Angiographic Control
Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 2007; 83(6): 2098 - 2102.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
MMCTSHome page
A. M. Calafiore, L. Weltert, M. D. Mauro, G. Actis-Dato, A. L. Iaco, P. Centofanti, M. L. Torre, and F. Patane
Internal mammary artery
MMCTS, November 29, 2005; 2005(1129): 1008.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 2005 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.