ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Kiyoyuki Eishi
Kazuyoshi Tanigawa
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Matsukuma, S.
Right arrow Articles by Takai, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Matsukuma, S.
Right arrow Articles by Takai, H.
Related Collections
Right arrow Valve disease

Ann Thorac Surg 2005;80:820-824
© 2005 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons


Original article: Cardiovascular

Risk Factors of Posterior Pericardial Annuloplasty for Isolated Posterior Leaflet Prolapse

Seiji Matsukuma, MD * , Kiyoyuki Eishi, MD, Shiro Yamachika, MD, Hiroichiro Yamaguchi, MD, Tsuneo Ariyoshi, MD, Youichi Hisata, MD, Kazuyoshi Tanigawa, MD, Kenta Izumi, MD, Hideaki Takai, MD

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Nagasaki University School of Medicine, Nagasaki, Japan

Accepted for publication March 21, 2005.

* Address reprint requests to Dr Matsukuma, Nagasaki University School of Medicine, Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, 1-7-1 Sakamoto, Nagasaki City, Nagasaki 852-8501, Japan (Email: seiji731{at}net.nagasaki-u.ac.jp).

BACKGROUND: Posterior autologous pericardial annuloplasty is an option in mitral valve repair. However, the durability of posterior pericardial annuloplasty remains controversial.

METHODS: From June 1999 to July 2004, 49 patients (18 male and 31 female; mean age, 64 ± 12 years) with isolated posterior leaflet prolapse received posterior autologous pericardial annuloplasty. Transthoracic echocardiographic examination before the operation, at the time of discharge, and then annually was performed and analyzed.

RESULTS: There was no incidence of in-hospital or late death. Only 1 patient (2.1%) required reoperation. In terms of recurrent mitral regurgitation, 31 patients (64.6%) exhibited grade 0 mitral regurgitation, 7 patients (14.6%) exhibited grade 1, and 9 patients (18.8%) exhibited grade 2, whereas only 1 patient (2.0%) exhibited more than grade 3. In terms of predicting postoperative recurrence of significant mitral regurgitation (≥grade 2), multivariate Cox analysis demonstrated that marked left atrial dilatation and high fractional shortening were independent risk factors. In 8 of 10 patients significant mitral regurgitation recurred after discharge. In terms of left atrial dimension, no significant reduction was observed in the postdischarge recurrent group, and there was a significant difference of left atrial dimension between the postdischarge recurrent group and the nonrecurrent group at the time of discharge.

CONCLUSIONS: The merits of mitral valve repair using posterior autologous pericardial annuloplasty are attractive. However, its use should be limited in selected patients with isolated posterior leaflet disease, nonenlarged atria, and non-high fractional shortening to maintain the durability of the mitral valve repair.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 2005 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.