HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Author home page(s): Donald E. Low Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Low, D. E. Articles by Unger, T. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Low, D. E. Articles by Unger, T.

Ann Thorac Surg 2005;80:287-294
© 2005 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons

---

Original article: General thoracic

Open Repair of Paraesophageal Hernia: Reassessment of Subjective and Objective Outcomes

Section of General Thoracic Surgery, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, Washington

Accepted for publication February 1, 2005.

^_* Address reprint requests to Dr Low, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Section of General Thoracic Surgery, 1100 Ninth Ave, Seattle, WA 98111 (Email: gtsdel{at}vmmc.org).

BACKGROUND: Surgical repair of paraesophageal hernias (PEH) remains a challenging operation. Increasing numbers of patients are undergoing laparoscopic repair. This series provides an up-to-date benchmark of the results of open repair of PEH to compare with current laparoscopic series.

METHODS: All patients undergoing surgical repair of PEH by a single surgeon between April 1996 and November 2001 were included. Follow-up included postoperative SF-36 survey and objective reassessment (barium swallow or endoscopy) at a mean of 29.8 months.

RESULTS: Seventy-two consecutive patients (mean age, 68.7 years) presented with large PEH. Presenting symptoms included heartburn (60%), dysphagia (43%), chest pain (42%), anemia (39%), and dyspnea (32%). Surgical treatment involved transabdominal open repair including sac excision, crural closure (primary closure 98.6%), and antireflux procedure (Hill procedure, 96%; Nissen fundoplication, 4%). No patient required a Collis procedure. Postoperative assessment (subjective, 97%; objective, 88%) was prospective. Median operative length was 155 minutes. Median length of stay was 4.5 days (range, 3 to 12 days). Postoperative complications occurred in 17 of 72 patients (23.6%), but no patient sustained intraoperative or postoperative visceral injuries. In-hospital and 30-day mortality was zero. Heartburn and dysphagia symptom scores demonstrated significant improvement (p < 0.001). Postoperative SF-36 scores demonstrated levels better than the general population (six of eight categories) and better than the age-matched population (eight of eight categories). Objective follow-up demonstrated recurrent hernias in 11 patients (18%). Most of these recurrences (73%) were less than 2-cm sliding hernias, and no patients required revisional surgery.

CONCLUSIONS: The results of open repair of PEH have continued to evolve in the same time that has seen the introduction of laparoscopic PEH repairs. Results with the open approach in the modern era can provide excellent outcomes, which are comparable to and in some measures exceed those obtained with the laparoscopic approach.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				B. A. Whitson, C. D. Hoang, A. K. Boettcher, P. S. Dahlberg, R. S. Andrade, and M. A. Maddaus Wedge gastroplasty and reinforced crural repair: important components of laparoscopic giant or recurrent hiatal hernia repair. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., November 1, 2006; 132(5): 1196 - 1202.e3. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]