| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
Ann Thorac Surg 2005;80:124-130
© 2005 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
a Department of Surgery II, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
b Department of Cardiology, Nishi-Tokyo Central General Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
c Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Sanno Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
Accepted for publication February 1, 2005.
* Address reprint requests to Dr Shimizu, Tokyo Medical University, Department of Surgery II, Nishishinjuku 6-7-1, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan (Email: tshimizu-cvs{at}umin.ac.jp).
BACKGROUND: Native flow competition is a significant factor affecting bypass graft patency. The objective of this study was to compare the effect of competitive flow on conduit flow dynamics in the gastroepiploic artery (GEA) and the saphenous vein graft (SVG).
METHODS: In 51 patents, 23 GEAs (in-situ grafts) and 28 SVGs (aortocoronary grafts) were examined using a Doppler-tipped guidewire during coronary angiography after coronary artery bypass. Graft flow volume at rest and maximum graft flow volume during hyperemia were calculated from graft diameter and average peak velocity at rest and maximum average peak velocity induced by papaverine hydrochloride injection. Grafts were classified according to the grade of native coronary artery stenosis; group S (14 GEAs and 16 SVGs) displayed over 75% stenosis and group M (9 GEAs and 12 SVGs) exhibited over 50% up to 75% stenosis.
RESULTS: In group S, no difference in flow volume was apparent between the GEA and the SVG at rest (36± 17 vs 42 ± 16) and during hyperemia (78 ± 30 vs 88 ± 28). In group M, flow volume of the GEA was significantly lower than that of the SVG at rest (17 ± 11 vs 38 ± 12; p = 0.029) and during hyperemia (32 ± 19 vs 94 ± 46; p = 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that in intermediate coronary stenosis, GEA flow is compromised by native flow competition, whereas the SVG flow dynamics is maintained. However, the GEA can provide comparable flow capacity to the SVG and will achieve good surgical results when target coronary artery selection is appropriate.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  M. Di Mauro, M. Contini, A. L. Iaco, A. Bivona, M. Gagliardi, E. Varone, P. Bosco, and A. M. Calafiore Bilateral internal thoracic artery on the left side: A propensity score-matched study of impact of the third conduit on the right side J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., April 1, 2009; 137(4): 869 - 874. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. Glineur, C. Hanet, A. Poncelet, W. D'hoore, J.-C. Funken, J. Rubay, P. Astarci, V. Lacroix, R. Verhelst, P. Y. Etienne, et al. Comparison of saphenous vein graft versus right gastroepiploic artery to revascularize the right coronary artery: a prospective randomized clinical, functional, and angiographic midterm evaluation. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., August 1, 2008; 136(2): 482 - 488. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 T. Eda, A. Matsuura, K. Miyahara, H. Takemura, S. Sawaki, T. Yoshioka, and N. Yoshida Transplantation of the Free Gastroepiploic Artery Graft for Myocardial Revascularization: Long-Term Clinical and Angiographic Results Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 2008; 85(3): 880 - 884. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |
