ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Gunnar Brandrup-Wognsen
Anders Jeppsson
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rexius, H.
Right arrow Articles by Jeppsson, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rexius, H.
Right arrow Articles by Jeppsson, A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Coronary disease

Ann Thorac Surg 2005;79:538-543
© 2005 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons


Original article: Cardiovascular

Waiting Time and Mortality After Elective Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Helena Rexius, MD, Gunnar Brandrup-Wognsen, MD, PhD, Anders Odén, PhD, Anders Jeppsson, MD, PhD*

Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden

Accepted for publication July 12, 2004.

* Address reprint requests to Dr Jeppsson, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, SE-413 45 Gothenburg, Sweden (E-mail: anders.jeppsson{at}vgregion.se).

BACKGROUND: Limited resources for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) results in waiting times, prioritization between patients, and to mortality among the patients on the waiting list. Waiting time is an independent predictor for mortality on the waiting list, but it is not clear if the waiting time also influences outcome after CABG.

METHODS: The study population was 5453 consecutive CABG patients who were prioritized at acceptance into three groups: imperative (CABG intended within 2 weeks), urgent (within 12 weeks), and routine (within 6 months). Postoperative mortality was compared between patients operated on within or after the intended waiting time in their respective groups. A multivariate Poisson regression model was used to further determine the effect of waiting time on postoperative mortality. Mean follow up was 24 ± 15 months.

RESULTS: Median waiting time was 55 days. Fifty-five percent of the patients were operated on within the intended waiting time. Postoperative mortality during follow-up was higher in patients operated on after the intended time (8.0 vs 6.2%, p = 0.014), but after correction for age, gender, operative risk, and angina symptoms, waiting time was not an independent predictor for postoperative death (risk ratio, 0.98 per waiting month; 95% confidence interval, 0.97 to 1.00; p = 0.44).

CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that mortality after CABG is not influenced by prolonged waiting time. The result does not exclude subgroups of patients that might benefit from a shorter waiting time.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
M. A. Diamond
Con: Single-Payer Health Care: Why It's Not the Best Answer
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., November 15, 2009; 180(10): 921 - 922.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CMAJHome page
H. Rexius
Should patients with stenosis of the left main coronary artery waiting for bypass grafting be given priority?
Can. Med. Assoc. J., August 16, 2005; 173(4): 381 - 382.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 2005 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.