HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Reichenspurner, H. Articles by Reichart, B. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Reichenspurner, H. Articles by Reichart, B. Related Collections Minimally invasive surgery

Ann Thorac Surg 2005;79:485-490
© 2005 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons

---

Original article: Cardiovascular

Video and Robotic-Assisted Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Surgery: A Comparison of the Port-Access and Transthoracic Clamp Techniques

^a Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg
^b Department of Cardiac Surgery, University Hospital Munich-Grosshadern, Munich, Germany

Accepted for publication June 11, 2004.

^* Address reprint requests to Dr Detter, Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr 52, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany (E-mail: detter{at}uke.uni-hamburg.de).

BACKGROUND: In order to assess different surgical techniques for video-assisted minimally invasive mitral valve surgery, a retrospective study was undertaken comparing the Port-Access system (Cardiovations, Ethicon Inc, Somerville, NJ) and the transthoracic clamp technique.

METHODS: In 120 patients mitral valve surgery was performed through a small right minithoracotomy using either the Port-Access endovascular cardiopulmonary bypass system (Port-Access, n = 60) or the transthoracic clamp technique (MICRO, n = 60). Mean patient age was 61.5 ± 10.5 years (81 patients with isolated mitral valve insufficiency, 39 patients with combined mitral valve disease).

RESULTS: Eighty-one (67.5%) patients underwent mitral valve repair and 39 (32.5%) patients had valve replacement. Mean time of surgery was 4.5 ± 3.5 and 4.1 ± 3.2 hours (p = 0.07), aortic cross-clamp time 89 ± 69 and 78 ± 65 minutes (p = 0.08), mean intensive care unit stay 1.5 ± 2.1 and 1.6 ± 2.5 days (p = ns), and hospital stay 9.0 ± 10.5 and 9.2 ± 9.7 days (p = ns) in the Port-Access and MICRO groups, respectively. In the Port-Access group, there were 6 reexplorations for bleeding, one perforation of the right ventricle with the endopulmonary vent, and 2 reconstructions of the femoral artery necessary after femoral cannulation, compared to one reexploration for bleeding in the MICRO group. There was only one minor paravalvular leak after replacement and 2 cases of residual greater than or equal to grade II mitral valve regurgitation after mitral valve repair in the Port-Access group, necessitating reoperation. In both groups, there was no mortality, no cerebrovascular accident, no aortic dissection, and no conversion to sternotomy.

CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery has become a standard approach for isolated mitral valve operations at our institution. The MICRO technique tends to shorten the time of surgery and aortic cross-clamping and reduces perioperative costs by simplifying the operative procedure.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. S. Rathore, S. Hussenbocus, R. Stuklis, and J. Edwards Novel strategies for recurrent cardiac myxoma. Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 2008; 85(6): 2125 - 2126. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Umakanthan, M. Leacche, M. R. Petracek, S. Kumar, N. V. Solenkova, C. A. Kaiser, J. P. Greelish, J. M. Balaguer, R. M. Ahmad, S. K. Ball, et al. Safety of minimally invasive mitral valve surgery without aortic cross-clamp. Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 2008; 85(5): 1544 - 1549. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. K. Rosengart, T. Feldman, M. A. Borger, T. A. Vassiliades Jr, A. M. Gillinov, K. J. Hoercher, A. Vahanian, R. O. Bonow, and W. O'Neill Percutaneous and Minimally Invasive Valve Procedures: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association Council on Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia, Council on Clinical Cardiology, Functional Genomics and Translational Biology Interdisciplinary Working Group, and Quality of Care and Outcomes Research Interdisciplinary Working Group Circulation, April 1, 2008; 117(13): 1750 - 1767. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. R. Chitwood Jr. and E. Rodriguez Minimally Invasive and Robotic Mitral Valve Surgery Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2008; 3(2008): 1079 - 1100. [Full Text]

				B. Kiaii, D. Bainbridge, and P. Fernandes Surgical, Anesthetic, Perfusion-Related Advances in Minimal Access Surgery Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, December 1, 2007; 11(4): 282 - 287. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. Maselli, R. Pizio, G. Borelli, and F. Musumeci Endovascular balloon versus transthoracic aortic clamping for minimally invasive mitral valve surgery: impact on cerebral microemboli Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, April 1, 2006; 5(2): 183 - 186. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. N. Girardi, K. H. Krieger, C. A. Mack, and O. W. Isom No-Clamp Technique for Valve Repair or Replacement in Patients With a Porcelain Aorta Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 2005; 80(5): 1688 - 1692. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]