ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jones, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by Athanasiou, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jones, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by Athanasiou, T.
Related Collections
Right arrow Trachea and bronchi
Right arrowRelated Article

Ann Thorac Surg 2005;79:365-374
© 2005 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons


Review

Is Virtual Bronchoscopy an Efficient Diagnostic Tool for the Thoracic Surgeon?

Catherine M. Jones, MBBSa, Thanos Athanasiou, MD, PhDa,*

a The National Heart and Lung Institute Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, St. Mary's Hospital, London, United Kingdom

* Address reprint requests to Dr Anthanasiou, Robotic and Minimally Invasive Cardiothoracic Surgery, 70 St Olaf's Rd, Fulham, London SW6 7DN, UK
tathan5253{at}aol.com

Virtual bronchoscopy has emerged over the past decade as a potentially complementary investigation to conventional bronchoscopy in the diagnosis, grading, and monitoring of pulmonary disease. A meta-analysis reporting on the use of virtual bronchoscopy has not yet been performed. The primary aim of this study is to evaluate its diagnostic accuracy compared to the gold standard investigation of conventional bronchoscopy (fiberoptic or rigid). Quantitative data synthesis included the calculation of independent sensitivity and specificity, construction of summary receiver operating characteristic curves, pooled analysis, and sensitivity analysis. Seventeen studies were identified comprising 459 patients. The calculated pooled sensitivity was 84% (95% CI, 78% to 89%), specificity 75% (95% CI, 62% to 85%) and area under the curve was 0.92, which shows good diagnostic performance. Meta-analysis confirms virtual bronchoscopy is very discriminating in the evaluation of patients with significant airway stenosis that is due to a wide spectrum of pathologic conditions. It can potentially have a beneficial role in selected thoracic patients (with bronchoesophageal fistulas, postlung transplantation, anastomoses, and suspected foreign body aspiration).


Related Article

Meta-Analysis of Positron Emission Tomographic and Computed Tomographic Imaging in Detecting Mediastinal Lymph Node Metastases in Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer
Özcan Birim, A. Pieter Kappetein, Theo Stijnen, and Ad J.J.C. Bogers
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2005 79: 375-382. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
P. Rekha, B. Thomas, J. M. Pappachan, K. P. Venugopal, T. K. Jayakumar, and P. Sukumaran
Tracheal rhinosporidiosis.
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., September 1, 2006; 132(3): 718 - 719.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 2005 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.