|
|
||||||||
Ann Thorac Surg 2004;78:1290-1294
© 2004 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
a Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
Accepted for publication March 2, 2004.
* Address reprint requests to Dr Barner, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, One Barnes-Jewish Hospital Plaza, Suite 3108 Queeny Tower, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA
barnerh{at}msnotes.wustl.edu
Presented at the Fiftieth Annual Meeting of the Southern Thoracic Surgical Association, Bonita Springs, FL, Nov 1315, 2003.
BACKGROUND: Complex use of arterial conduits has resurrected concerns about the adequacy of conduit flow. The T-graft is the extreme example of this trend. Our purpose was to identify the limitation of single source inflow and to compare flow capacity with completion coronary flow.
METHODS: Between February 1999 and November 2001, 372 patients underwent total arterial revascularization with the T-graft alone. Intraoperative flows were recorded for each limb of the T-graft before and after distal anastomoses in 204 patients. Independent predictors of T-graft flow were identified by multivariate analysis.
RESULTS: Free flow for the radial arterial (RA) limb was 161 ± 81 mL/min, the internal thoracic artery (ITA) limb 137 ± 57 mL/min (combined 298 ± 101 mL/min) versus simultaneous limb flow of 226 ± 84 mL/min giving a flow restriction of 24% ± 14%. Completion coronary flow was 88 ± 49 mL/min for the RA, 60 ± 45 mL/min for the ITA, and 140 ± 70 mL/min for both limbs simultaneously to give a flow reserve (vs simultaneous free flow) of 160% or 1.6. Independent predictors of completion RA limb flow are RA proximal diameter (p = 0.005), number of anastomoses (p = 0.018), and target stenosis (p = 0.005).
CONCLUSIONS: A flow reserve of 1.6 compares favorably with an ITA flow reserve of 1.8 at 1-month postoperatively and 1.8 for both the ITA T-graft and the ITA/RA T-graft at 1-week postoperatively as reported by others. Proximal RA diameter and competitive coronary flow influence completion T-graft flow. These data quantitate the limitation of single source inflow of the T-graft configuration and support its continued use.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. Glineur, C. Hanet, A. Poncelet, W. D'hoore, J.-C. Funken, J. Rubay, J. Kefer, P. Astarci, V. Lacroix, R. Verhelst, et al. Comparison of Bilateral Internal Thoracic Artery Revascularization Using In Situ or Y Graft Configurations: A Prospective Randomized Clinical, Functional, and Angiographic Midterm Evaluation Circulation, September 30, 2008; 118(14_suppl_1): S216 - S221. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Shrestha, N. Khaladj, H. Kamiya, M. Maringka, A. Haverich, and C. Hagl Total Arterial Revascularization and Concomitant Aortic Valve Replacement Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, October 1, 2007; 15(5): 381 - 385. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. B. Barner Status of percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., September 1, 2006; 30(3): 419 - 424. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. B. Barner, T. M. Sundt III, and C. K. Choong Valve Replacement After T-Grafting: "Beating Heart Surgery" Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2006; 81(2): 756 - 757. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Glineur, P. Noirhomme, J. Reisch, G. El Khoury, P. Astarci, and C. Hanet Resistance to Flow of Arterial Y-Grafts 6 Months After Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery Circulation, August 30, 2005; 112(9_suppl): I-281 - I-285. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. B. Barner Vascular remodeling as a biologic principle: Is the ulnar artery an exception? J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., July 1, 2005; 130(1): 7 - 8. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |