|
|
||||||||
Ann Thorac Surg 2004;78:1170-1176
© 2004 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
a Department of Surgery, Wilford Hall Medical Center, San Antonio, Texas, USA
b Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
Accepted for publication February 10, 2004.
* Address reprint requests to Dr D'Amico, Box 3496, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
damic001{at}mc.duke.edu
Presented at the Fiftieth Annual Meeting of the Southern Thoracic Surgical Association, Bonita Springs, FL, Nov 1315, 2003.
BACKGROUND: Esophagogastrectomy (EG) is a formidable operation with significant morbidity and mortality rates. Risk factor analyses have been performed, but few studies have produced strategies that have improved operative results. This study was performed in order to identify prognostic variables that might be used to develop a strategy for optimizing outcomes after EG.
METHODS: The records of all patients (n = 379) who underwent EG patients at a tertiary medical center between 1996 and 2002 were retrospectively reviewed. Thirty-day morbidity and mortality were determined, and multivariable logistical regression analysis assessed the effect of preoperative and postoperative variables on early mortality.
RESULTS: Operations included Ivor Lewis (n = 179), transhiatal (n = 130), and other approaches (n = 70). Operative mortality was 5.8%; 64% experienced complications, including respiratory complications (28.5%), anastamotic strictures (25%), and leak (14%). Increasing age, anastomotic leak, Charlson comorbidity index 3, worse swallowing scores, and pneumonia were associated with increased risk of mortality by univariate analysis. However, only age (p = 0.002) and pneumonia (p = 0.0008) were independently associated with mortality by multivariable analysis. Pneumonia was associated with a 20% incidence of death. Patients with pneumonia had significantly worse deglutition and anastomotic integrity on barium esophagogram compared with patients without pneumonia (p < 0.001, Mann-Whitney rank sum test).
CONCLUSIONS: Morbidity and mortality of EG are significant, but most complications, including anastomotic leak, are not independent predictors of mortality. The most important complication after EG is pneumonia. Strategies to decrease postoperative mortality should include careful assessment of swallowing abnormalities and predisposition to aspiration by cineradiography or fiberoptic endoscopy. After EG, acceptable pharyngeal function and airway protection should be verified before resuming oral intake.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. J. Cerfolio, A. S. Bryant, C. L. Canon, R. Dhawan, and M. A. Eloubeidi Is botulinum toxin injection of the pylorus during Ivor-Lewis esophagogastrectomy the optimal drainage strategy? J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., March 1, 2009; 137(3): 565 - 572. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. D. Wright, J. C. Kucharczuk, S. M. O'Brien, J. D. Grab, and M. S. Allen Predictors of major morbidity and mortality after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Surgery Database risk adjustment model. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., March 1, 2009; 137(3): 587 - 595. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. E. Kight Nutrition Considerations in Esophagectomy Patients Nutr Clin Pract, October 1, 2008; 23(5): 521 - 528. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Pennathur and J. D. Luketich Resection for Esophageal Cancer: Strategies for Optimal Management Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2008; 85(2): S751 - S756. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Eisold, A. Mehrabi, L. Konstantinidis, M. Mieth, U. Hinz, A. Kashfi, H. Fonouni, B. P. Muller-Stich, M. M. Gebhard, J. Schmidt, et al. Experimental Study of Cardiorespiratory and Stress Factors in Esophageal Surgery Using Robot-Assisted Thoracoscopic or Open Thoracic Approach Arch Surg, February 1, 2008; 143(2): 156 - 163. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. S. H. Wilmot, M. S. Levine, S. E. Rubesin, J. C. Kucharczuk, and I. Laufer Intraluminal Migration of Surgical Drains After Transhiatal Esophagogastrectomy: Radiographic Findings and Clinical Relevance Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2007; 189(4): 780 - 785. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Almahmeed, R. Gonzalez, L. G. Nelson, K. Haines, S. F. Gallagher, and M. M. Murr Morbidity of Anastomotic Leaks in Patients Undergoing Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Arch Surg, October 1, 2007; 142(10): 954 - 957. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Lanuti, P. E. de Delva, A. Maher, C. D. Wright, H. A. Gaissert, J. C. Wain, D. M. Donahue, and D. J. Mathisen Feasibility and Outcomes of an Early Extubation Policy After Esophagectomy Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 2006; 82(6): 2037 - 2041. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Bizekis, M. S. Kent, J. D. Luketich, P. O. Buenaventura, R. J. Landreneau, M. J. Schuchert, and M. Alvelo-Rivera Initial Experience With Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 2006; 82(2): 402 - 407. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Michelet, X.-B. D'Journo, A. Roch, L. Papazian, J. Ragni, P. Thomas, and J.-P. Auffray Perioperative Risk Factors for Anastomotic Leakage After Esophagectomy: Influence of Thoracic Epidural Analgesia Chest, November 1, 2005; 128(5): 3461 - 3466. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |