ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Thoralf M. Sundt, III
Kenton J. Zehr
Joseph A. Dearani
Richard C. Daly
Charles J. Mullany
Christopher G. A. McGregor
Francisco J. Puga
Hartzell V. Schaff
Thomas A. Orszulak
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Potter, D. D.
Right arrow Articles by Orszulak, T. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Potter, D. D.
Right arrow Articles by Orszulak, T. A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Valve disease

Ann Thorac Surg 2004;78:67-72
© 2004 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons


Original article: cardiovascular

Risk of repeat mitral valve replacement for failed mitral valve prostheses

D. Dean Potter, MDa, Thoralf M. Sundt, III, MDa*, Kenton J. Zehr, MDa, Joseph A. Dearani, MDa, Richard C. Daly, MDa, Charles J. Mullany, MDa, Christopher G. A. McGregor, MDa, Francisco J. Puga, MDa, Hartzell V. Schaff, MDa, Thomas A. Orszulak, MDa

a Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA

Accepted for publication February 3, 2004.

* Address reprint requests to Dr Sundt, Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
e-mail: sundt.thoralf{at}mayo.edu

Presented at the Fiftieth Annual Meeting of the Southern Thoracic Surgical Association, Bonita Springs, FL, Nov 13–15, 2003.

BACKGROUND: Advances in tissue prosthetic valve design and manufacturing have stimulated renewed interest in the use of biological valves in younger patients. This approach, however, risks reoperation. We therefore reviewed our recent experience with repeat mitral valve replacement to better define its contemporary risks.

METHODS: Using a computerized database, we identified and compared 106 patients undergoing repeat mitral valve replacement with 562 control patients undergoing primary mitral valve replacement between January 1993 and December 2000 at our institution.

RESULTS: There were no significant differences between repeat and primary surgery groups with respect to age (mean 66 ± 12 vs 64 ± 13 years), gender distribution (women 65% vs 64%), preoperative functional class, ejection fraction, or active endocarditis (6.6% vs 3.4%). The indication for reoperation in the repeat group was structural dysfunction in 49 patients (46%), paravalvular leak in 21 patients (20%), nonstructural dysfunction in 11 patients (10%), and progression of other native valve disease in 8 patients (8%). Prior prostheses were mechanical in 46 patients (43%). Mean time to reoperation was 11.5 ± 7.1 years. There were 5 deaths out of 106 patients in the repeat group (4.7%) and there were 23 deaths out of 562 patients in the control group (4.1%) (p = NS). Multivariate analysis identified prior myocardial infarction (p = 0.014, odds ratio 2.9) and nonelective surgical status (p = 0.004, odds ratio 2.3) as significant predictors of operative mortality.

CONCLUSIONS: The risk of repeat mitral valve replacement was low suggesting that there should be less reluctance to recommend patients choose a bioprosthesis over a mechanical prosthesis. Given the expected durability of current designs, bioprosthetic use may be explored in younger patients without subjecting those individuals to excessive risk.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
G. H.L. Tang, M. Maganti, T. E. David, C. M. Feindel, H. E. Scully, and M. A. Borger
Effect of Prior Valve Type on Mortality in Reoperative Valve Surgery
Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 2007; 83(3): 938 - 945.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Asian Cardiovasc. Thorac. Ann.Home page
Y. Watanabe, S. Ohkawa, K. Yamabuki, H. Tsuneoka, N. Sugiyama, and T. Hiyama
A Case of 24 Years Longevity of an Ionescu-Shiley Bioprosthesis in the Mitral Position
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, October 1, 2006; 14(5): e96 - e98.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
N. Luciani, G. Nasso, A. Anselmi, F. Glieca, M. Gaudino, F. Girola, M. Piscitelli, M. Perisano, L. Martinelli, and G. Possati
Repeat Valvular Operations: Bench Optimization of Conventional Surgery
Ann. Thorac. Surg., April 1, 2006; 81(4): 1279 - 1283.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
S. H. Rahimtoola
The Year in Valvular Heart Disease
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 17, 2006; 47(2): 427 - 439.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 2004 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.