ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Antone J. Tatooles
Mark S. Slaughter
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tatooles, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by Slaughter, M. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tatooles, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by Slaughter, M. S.
Related Collections
Right arrow Valve disease

Ann Thorac Surg 2004;77:1978-1984
© 2004 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons


Original article: cardiovascular

Minimally invasive mitral valve repair using the da Vinci robotic system

Antone J. Tatooles, MDa, Patroklos S. Pappas, MDa, Paul J. Gordon, MDa, Mark S. Slaughter, MDa*

a Division of Cardiac Surgery, Advocate Christ Medical Center, Oak Lawn, Illinois, USA

Accepted for publication November 25, 2003.

* Address correspondence to Dr Slaughter, Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgical Associates, SC, 4400 W 95th St, Suite 205, Oak Lawn, IL 60453, USA
e-mail: mscabg{at}aol.com

Presented at the Thirty-ninth Annual Meeting of The Society of Thoracic Surgeons, San Diego, CA, Jan 31–Feb 2, 2003.

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive mitral valve repair with a shortened hospital stay and quick return to an active lifestyle is the ultimate goal for robotically assisted surgery. We evaluated our da Vinci robotically assisted mitral valve repair experience toward achieving this goal.

METHODS: All procedures were performed with peripheral cardiopulmonary bypass, transthoracic aortic cross-clamp, and antegrade cardioplegia. Two ports and a 4-cm intercostal incision in the right chest were used for access. All patients had a ring annuloplasty, and all but 1 had a posterior leaflet resection. The entire repair and all knot tying were performed robotically.

RESULTS: Between October 2001 and October 2002, 25 patients (18 men) underwent robotic mitral valve repair. The mean age was 56 years (range, 37 to 81 years). There were no incisional conversions, deaths, strokes, or reoperations for bleeding. Twenty-one (84%) of 25 patients were extubated in the operating room. Overall mean study times were as follows: procedure, 199.7 minutes (range, 140 to 287 minutes); cardiopulmonary bypass, 126.6 minutes (range, 89 to 186 minutes); and cross-clamp, 87.7 minutes (range, 58 to 143 minutes). Eight (32%) patients were discharged home in less than 24 hours, with an average length of stay of 2.7 days. Comparing the first 10 patients to the last 15 there was a significant reduction of times: total operating room time, 318.5 versus 275.1 minutes; cross-clamp, 97.6 versus 81.1 minutes; leaflet resection or repair, 26.2 versus 15.6 minutes; annuloplasty ring, 31.9 versus 24.8 minutes; and length of stay, from 4.2 days to 1.67 days. Five patients had postoperative atrial fibrillation. Two (8%) patients ultimately required mitral valve replacement for recurrent mitral insufficiency.

CONCLUSIONS: Mitral valve repair can be successfully performed with the da Vinci robotic system. Long-term follow-up is needed to determine the durability of the repair compared with a standard sternotomy approach.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
W. R. Chitwood Jr., E. Rodriguez, M. W.A. Chu, A. Hassan, T. B. Ferguson, P. W. Vos, and L. W. Nifong
Robotic mitral valve repairs in 300 patients: a single-center experience.
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., August 1, 2008; 136(2): 436 - 441.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
T. K. Rosengart, T. Feldman, M. A. Borger, T. A. Vassiliades Jr, A. M. Gillinov, K. J. Hoercher, A. Vahanian, R. O. Bonow, and W. O'Neill
Percutaneous and Minimally Invasive Valve Procedures: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association Council on Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia, Council on Clinical Cardiology, Functional Genomics and Translational Biology Interdisciplinary Working Group, and Quality of Care and Outcomes Research Interdisciplinary Working Group
Circulation, April 1, 2008; 117(13): 1750 - 1767.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
T. Folliguet, F. Vanhuyse, X. Constantino, M. Realli, and F. Laborde
Mitral valve repair robotic versus sternotomy
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., March 1, 2006; 29(3): 362 - 366.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
SEMIN CARDIOTHORAC VASC ANESTHHome page
C. L. Lake
Simulation in Cardiology and Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery
Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, December 1, 2005; 9(4): 325 - 333-1.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 2004 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.