HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Author home page(s): Gil Bolotin Walter W. Scott, Jr Alan P. Kypson L. Wiley Nifong Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Bolotin, G. Articles by Chitwood, W. R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Bolotin, G. Articles by Chitwood, W. R., Jr Related Collections Minimally invasive surgery

Ann Thorac Surg 2004;77:1262-1265
© 2004 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons

---

Original article: cardiovascular

Robotic skeletonizing of the internal thoracic artery: is it safe?

^a Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Brody School of Medicine at East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina USA

Accepted for publication September 23, 2003.

^* Address reprint requests to Dr Bolotin, Department of Surgery, Tel Aviv Medical Center, 6 Weizman St, Tel Aviv, Israel
e-mail: bolotin{at}tasmc.health.gov.il

BACKGROUND: The advantages of internal thoracic artery skeletonization include early high blood flow, a longer conduit, and less bleeding than pedicle internal thoracic artery grafts. Longer conduits are needed for complete endoscopic arterial revascularization. Therefore this study was designed to determine the feasibility and safety of internal thoracic artery skeletonization using the da Vinci robotic system (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA).

METHODS: Nine dogs underwent bilateral robotic internal thoracic artery harvesting through three ports placed in the left chest. One internal thoracic artery was harvested as a pedicle in each dog, and the other was skeletonized. Internal thoracic artery blood flow was measured in each graft, and comparative endothelial histologic studies were performed. Data are mean ± the standard error of the mean.

RESULTS: All 18 internal thoracic arteries were harvested successfully. Skeletonized internal thoracic artery harvests required more time (48.0 minutes ± 1.8) than pedicle internal thoracic artery harvests (39.0 minutes ± 1.4; p < 0.05). Internal thoracic artery flows during the final intervals were similar (skeletonized = 30.0 mL/min ± 2.4 vs pedicle = 31.5 mL/min ± 1.8; p = 0.9). Free internal thoracic artery bleeding flow was similar in both groups (skeletonized = 162.0 mL/min ± 3.0 vs pedicle = 189.0 mL/min ± 2.4; p = 0.4). Histologically, both groups were similar with minimal endothelial damage.

CONCLUSIONS: Robotically skeletonized harvesting is safe, but it requires more time (48.0 minutes ± 1.8) than pedicle internal thoracic artery harvesting. Despite muted tactile feedback with robotics, neither technique was associated with histologic or functional damage. These encouraging results may represent an advantage for complete arterial revascularization in robotic coronary bypass patients.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				V. Falk and F. W. Mohr Minimally Invasive Myocardial Revascularization Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2008; 3(2008): 697 - 710. [Full Text]

				G. Bisleri, T. Bottio, and C. Muneretto Endoscopic Radial Artery Harvesting With a Novel Vessel Sealing System Ann. Thorac. Surg., April 1, 2007; 83(4): 1580 - 1581. [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Oehlinger, N. Bonaros, T. Schachner, E. Ruetzler, G. Friedrich, G. Laufer, and J. Bonatti Robotic Endoscopic Left Internal Mammary Artery Harvesting: What Have We Learned After 100 Cases? Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 2007; 83(3): 1030 - 1034. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]