ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sanjuán, R.
Right arrow Articles by Otero, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sanjuán, R.
Right arrow Articles by Otero, E.
Related Collections
Right arrow Electrophysiology - arrhythmias

Ann Thorac Surg 2004;77:838-843
© 2004 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons


Original article: cardiovascular

Preoperative use of sotalol versus atenolol for atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery

Rafael Sanjuán, PhDa*, Marisa Blasco, PhDa, Nieves Carbonell, MDa, Angela Jordá, MDa, Julio Núñez, MDa, Juan Martínez-León, PhDb, Eduardo Otero, PhDb

a Division of Coronary Care Unit, Valencia, Spain
b Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Clinic University Hospital, Valencia, Spain

Accepted for publication May 6, 2003.

* Address reprint requests to Dr Sanjuán, Unitat Coronaria, Hospital Clínic Universitari, Av Blasco Ibáñez 17, 46010, Valencia, Spain.
e-mail: sanjuan_raf{at}gva.es

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation is one of the most common complications of cardiac surgery. Beta blockers have been demonstrated to decrease the incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation. Preliminary investigations reporting sotalol and atenolol to be effective in preventing postoperative atrial fibrillation are encouraging, but no studies have been conducted comparing both drugs.

METHODS: A total of 253 consecutive eligible patients (66 ± 8 years; mean ± standard deviation) scheduled to undergo cardiac surgery were enrolled in this study. Patients were randomized in a prospective open manner 1.5:1 to atenolol group (50 mg/daily; 153 patients) or sotalol group (80 mg twice daily; 100 patients).

RESULTS: Atrial fibrillation occurred in 44/253 patients (17.45%). A significant difference was found in the occurrence of atrial fibrillation in the atenolol group (34 patients, 22%) compared with those receiving sotalol (10 patients, 10%; p = 0.013). Therapeutic efficiency and efficacy was 12% and 54%, respectively. Stepwise logistic regression analysis revealed that age more than 68 years old (odds ratio = 2.72; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.37–5.41; p = 0.004), the use of ß-adrenergic agents (odds ratio = 2.74; 95% CI = 1.5–5; p = 0.001), and sotalol (odds ratio = 0.46; 95% CI = 0.23–0.95; p = 0.035) were independently associated with development of atrial fibrillation.

CONCLUSIONS: Oral low-dose sotalol provides a considerable reduction in the occurrence of atrial fibrillation. A selective approach based on clinical risk prediction should decrease the occurrence of atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
J. Dunning, T. Treasure, M. Versteegh, S. A.M. Nashef, and on behalf of the EACTS Audit and Guidelines Commit
Guidelines on the prevention and management of de novo atrial fibrillation after cardiac and thoracic surgery
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., December 1, 2006; 30(6): 852 - 872.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
D. C. Burgess, M. J. Kilborn, and A. C. Keech
Interventions for prevention of post-operative atrial fibrillation and its complications after cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis
Eur. Heart J., December 1, 2006; 27(23): 2846 - 2857.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
J. Dunning and P. McKeown
Are the american college of chest physicians guidelines for the prevention and management of atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery already obsolete?
Chest, April 1, 2006; 129(4): 1112 - 1113.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
R. H. Jones
The Year in Cardiovascular Surgery
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 3, 2005; 45(9): 1517 - 1528.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ICVTSHome page
A. Patel and J. Dunning
Is Sotalol more effective than standard beta-blockers for the prophylaxis of atrial fibrillation during cardiac surgery
Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, April 1, 2005; 4(2): 147 - 150.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 2004 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.