|
|
||||||||
Ann Thorac Surg 2004;77:518-522
© 2004 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
a Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
Accepted for publication April 9, 2003.
* Address reprint requests to Dr Grossi, NYU Medical Center, Suite 9-V, 530 First Ave, New York, NY 10016, USA.
e-mail: grossi{at}cv.med.nyu.edu
BACKGROUND: Traditional mitral annuloplasty devices include both rigid rings, which restrict annular motion, and soft rings and bands, which can locally deform. Conflicting data exist regarding their impact on annular dynamics. We studied mitral annuloplasty with a semirigid partial band and with a nearly complete rigid ring.
METHODS: Intraoperative three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiograms (n = 14) and predischarge transthoracic echocardiograms were retrospectively analyzed in patients undergoing mitral valve repair for degenerative disease with either a rigid ring (n = 77) or a semirigid partial band (n = 38). Each transesophageal echocardiogram was analyzed with TomTec three-dimensional software to produce cardiac cycle frame planimetry and to measure device geometry. Actual device sizes provided reference dimensions. Blinded analysis of Doppler data from transthoracic echocardiograms was performed.
RESULTS: Validation of the quantitative transesophageal echocardiogram methodology revealed a 1.3% ± 0.3% (mean ± standard error of the mean) underestimation of actual linear dimension. With the semirigid partial band, systolic valve orifice area and intertrigonal distance decreased from 6.14 ± 0.37 to 5.55 ± 0.24 cm2 (-9.6%; p = 0.01) and from 2.69 ± 0.08 to 2.55 ± 0.13 cm (-5.2%; p = 0.03), respectively. Systolic anterior-posterior distance decreased from 2.1 ± 0.10 to 1.95 ± 0.06 cm (-7.1%; p = 0.01) compared with diastole. In contrast, rigid ring orifice area was unchanged (4.12 ± 0.15 to 4.10 ± 0.16 cm2; -0.5%; p = 0.48) during the cardiac cycle. Transthoracic echocardiography revealed significantly lower mitral inflow gradients with semirigid partial band (mean gradients compared with rigid ring, 4.0 ± 0.3 versus 5.0 ± 0.3 mm Hg; p = 0.02; peak gradients, 8.9 ± 0.5 versus 11.1 ± 0.5 mm Hg; p = 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiographic measurements of annular dynamics are valid and reliable when discrete annuloplasty devices are present. In contrast to the rigid ring, the semirigid partial band permits more physiologic geometric changes and is associated with lower postoperative mitral valve gradients.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. M. Suri, H. M. Burkhart, R. C. Daly, J. A. Dearani, S. J. Park, T. M. Sundt III, Z. Li, M. Enriquez-Sarano, and H. V. Schaff Robotic mitral valve repair for all prolapse subsets using techniques identical to open valvuloplasty: Establishing the benchmark against which percutaneous interventions should be judged J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., November 1, 2011; 142(5): 970 - 979. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. A. Vohra, R. N. Whistance, L. Bezuska, and S. A. Livesey Initial experience of mitral valve repair using the Carpentier-Edwards Physio II annuloplasty ring Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, June 1, 2011; 39(6): 881 - 885. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Bothe, J. P. Escobar Kvitting, J. C. Swanson, S. Hartnett, N. B. Ingels Jr., and D. C. Miller Effects of different annuloplasty rings on anterior mitral leaflet dimensions J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., May 1, 2010; 139(5): 1114 - 1122. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Itoh, D. B. Ennis, W. Bothe, J. C. Swanson, G. Krishnamurthy, T. C. Nguyen, N. B. Ingels Jr., and D. C. Miller Mitral annular hinge motion contribution to changes in mitral septal-lateral dimension and annular area J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., November 1, 2009; 138(5): 1090 - 1099. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. F. Purser, A. L. Richards, R. C. Cook, J. A. Osborne, D. R. Cormier, and G. D. Buckner Evaluation of a Shape Memory Alloy Reinforced Annuloplasty Band for Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Repair Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 2009; 88(4): 1312 - 1316. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Lange, T. Guenther, B. Kiefer, C. Noebauer, W. Goetz, R. Busch, P. Tassani-Prell, B. Voss, and R. Bauernschmitt Mitral valve repair with the new semirigid partial Colvin-Galloway Future annuloplasty band J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., May 1, 2008; 135(5): 1087 - 1093. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Aybek, P. Risteski, and A. Moritz Reply to the Editor J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., March 1, 2007; 133(3): 850 - 851. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. T. Chan, C. S. Chiu, L.-C. Cheng, and T. W. Au Mitral Valve Annuloplasty with Carpentier-Edwards Physio Ring: Mid-term Results Asian Cardiovascular and Thoracic Annals, October 1, 2006; 14(5): 382 - 386. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Hartrumpf, U. A. Stock, R.-U. Kuehnel, and J. M. Albes Fracture of colvin-galloway future band causing a tear in the anterior mitral leaflet. Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 2006; 81(5): 1879 - 1880. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |