HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Author home page(s): Thomas F. Molnar Kumarasingham Jeyasingham Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Molnar, T. F. Articles by Rendeki, S. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Molnar, T. F. Articles by Rendeki, S. Related Collections Chest wall

Ann Thorac Surg 2004;77:372-378
© 2004 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons

---

Our surgical heritage

Changing dogmas: history of development in treatment modalities of traumatic pneumothorax, hemothorax, and posttraumatic empyema thoracis

^a Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Medical School, Military Hospital, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary
^b Department of Intensive Therapy, Military Hospital, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary
^c Surgical Clinic, University Medical School, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
^d Frenchay Hospital, Bristol, United Kingdom

^* Address reprint requests to Dr Molnar, Department of Thoracic Surgery, University of Pécs, H-7633 Pécs, Ifjuság u., 13, Hungary
e-mail: mft{at}iseb.pote.hu

Development of treatment modalities for chest wounds and traumatic empyema thoracis is reviewed in the light of war experience. Mortality from thoracic injury was more than 50% before World War I and was about 25% during World War I. It came down to 10% in World War II and was about 5% during the Korean War. It improved further during the Vietnam War, until it ranged at 2% to 4%, where no further improvement could be imagined. Thoracic surgery was born in the field hospitals of World War I. Established drainage methods and standardized anesthesia made thoracotomy a standard procedure in World War II. As experience increased in chest trauma, surgical aggression diminished. Drainage ruled primary chest trauma treatment algorithms during the Vietnam War and coexisted with the full arsenal of cardiothoracic surgery when it was needed. Optimization of thoracic surgical aggression includes a case-tailored approach when major chest surgery with or without interventions on the central cardiovascular system is needed. This is where we are now, provided a proper logistic, Medevac system exists. If we let the past fade away, the danger of committing the mistakes of our predecessors increases without having their excuses. Our present is only the past of the future.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				T. F. Molnar Invited Commentary Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 2009; 88(4): 1136 - 1137. [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. F. Molnar Current surgical treatment of thoracic empyema in adults Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, September 1, 2007; 32(3): 422 - 430. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]