HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Author home page(s): James W. Jones Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Losanoff, J. E. Articles by Jones, J. W. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Losanoff, J. E. Articles by Jones, J. W. Related Collections Chest wall

Ann Thorac Surg 2004;77:203-209
© 2004 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons

---

Original article: cardiovascular

Biomechanical comparison of median sternotomy closures

^a Department of Surgery, University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, Missouri, USA
^b Department of Pathology, University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, Missouri, USA
^c Department of Biological Engineering, University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, Missouri, USA
^d Department of Psychiatry, University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, Missouri, USA

Accepted for publication July 29, 2003.

^* Address reprint requests to Dr Jones, Department of Surgery, M580 Health Sciences Center, University of Missouri-Columbia School of Medicine, One Hospital Dr, Columbia, MO 65212, USA.
e-mail: jonesjw{at}health.missouri.edu

BACKGROUND: Poor healing of median sternotomy can significantly increase morbidity, mortality, and hospital costs. Effective union requires reliable sternal fixation. Although wire has proven the most reliable and widely used sternotomy closure material, no experimental studies have compared a large variety of wiring techniques in a human model. We developed an easily reproducible experimental model using cadaveric human sterna and compared several wiring methods to assess closure strength and stability.

METHODS: Fifty-three fresh adult human cadaveric sternal plates with adjacent ribs were fixed with specially designed spiked stainless steel clamps and attached to a texture analyzer. Single peristernal and transsternal, alternating single peristernal and transsternal, figure-eight peristernal, figure-eight pericostal, and Robicsek closures using no. 5 stainless steel wires were tested. We evaluated bone density, stiffness, and displacement using perpendicular, repetitive variable force loads of 800 Newtons cycling at a rate of 0.5 mm/s.

RESULTS: There were no significant differences in age, sex, or bone density in outcome measures of the sternal groups. No clamp failures or clamp damage to the specimens occurred. The single peristernal and alternating peristernal and transsternal closures proved superior in strength and stability (p < 0.001). The figure-eight peristernal, then the single transsternal, then the Robicsek were next stablest groups in decreasing order. The figure-eight pericostal closure had the highest failure rate (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS: This novel model of sternotomy closure testing was reliable, inexpensive, and easily reproducible. The mechanical stability of peristernal and alternating peristernal and transsternal wires was significantly greater than that of the other tested methods. Pericostal figure-eight closures were not sufficiently stable to be considered a reliable method of primary sternotomy repair.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. I. Sersar, I. M. Fouad, W. A. AbuKhudair, and A. A. Jamjoom Open chest after cardiac surgery; revisited Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., October 1, 2008; 34(4): 929 - 929. [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Schimmer, S.-P. Sommer, M. Bensch, T. Bohrer, I. Aleksic, and R. Leyh Sternal closure techniques and postoperative sternal wound complications in elderly patients. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., July 1, 2008; 34(1): 132 - 138. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. C.H. John Modified closure technique for reducing sternal dehiscence; a clinical and in vitro assessment Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., May 1, 2008; 33(5): 769 - 773. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. E. Losanoff, M. D. Basson, S. A. Gruber, H. Huff, and F.-h. Hsieh Single Wire Versus Double Wire Loops for Median Sternotomy Closure: Experimental Biomechanical Study Using a Human Cadaveric Model Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 2007; 84(4): 1288 - 1293. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Oto, R. Venkatachalam, Y. S. Morsi, S. Marasco, A. Pick, M. Rabinov, and F. Rosenfeldt A reinforced sternal wiring technique for transverse thoracosternotomy closure in bilateral lung transplantation: From biomechanical test to clinical application J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., July 1, 2007; 134(1): 218 - 224. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. E. Losanoff Invited commentary. Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2006; 82(3): 907 - 908. [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. F. Immer, M. Durrer, K. S. Muhlemann, D. Erni, B. Gahl, and T. P. Carrel Deep Sternal Wound Infection After Cardiac Surgery: Modality of Treatment and Outcome Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2005; 80(3): 957 - 961. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Pai, N. J. Gunja, E. L. Dupak, N. L. McMahon, T. P. Roth, J. F. Lalikos, R. M. Dunn, N. Francalancia, G. D. Pins, and K. L. Billiar In Vitro Comparison of Wire and Plate Fixation for Midline Sternotomies Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2005; 80(3): 962 - 968. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. E. Losanoff Invited commentary Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2005; 80(3): 968 - 968. [Full Text] [PDF]