HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Kojima, K. Articles by Vacanti, C. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Kojima, K. Articles by Vacanti, C. A. Related Collections Trachea and bronchi

Ann Thorac Surg 2003;76:1884-1888
© 2003 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons

---

Original article: general thoracic

Comparison of tracheal and nasal chondrocytes for tissue engineering of the trachea

^a Laboratory for Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
^b Center for Tissue Engineering, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA

Accepted for publication June 30, 2003.

^* Address reprint requests to Dr Kojima, Laboratory for Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Brigham & Women's Hospital, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115, USA
e-mail: kojima{at}zeus.bwh.harvard.edu

BACKGROUND: This study was undertaken to evaluate the feasibility of creating engineered tracheal equivalents grown in the shape of cylindrical cartilaginous structures using sheep nasal cartilage–derived chondrocytes. We also tested sheep tracheal and nasal septum for cell yield and quality of the engineered cartilage each produced.

METHODS: Nasal septum and tracheal tissue were harvested from sheep. Chondrocytes from each were separately isolated from the tissues and suspended in culture media. Tracheal and nasal chondrocytes were seeded onto separate polyglycolic acid matrices. Cell-polymer constructs were cultured for 1 week and then wrapped around a 7-mm diameter x 30-mm length silicon tube and implanted subcutaneously on the back of nude mice for 8 weeks (each, n = 6). Both of the tissue-engineered tracheas (TET) were harvested and analyzed for histological, biochemical, and biomechanical properties. These values were compared with native sheep trachea.

RESULTS: The morphology and histology of both tracheal-chondrocyte TET and nasal-chondrocyte TET closely resembled that of native sheep trachea. Safranin-O staining showed that tissue-engineered cartilage was organized into lobules with round, angular lacunae, each containing a single chondrocyte. Chondrocytes from the trachea or nasal septum produced tissue with similar mechanical properties and had similar glycosaminoglycan and hydroxyproline content.

CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that the property of TET using nasal chondrocytes is similar to that obtained using tracheal chondrocytes. This has the potential benefit of facilitating an autologous approach for repair of segmental tracheal defects using an easily obtained chondrocyte population.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				Q. Tan, R. Steiner, S. P. Hoerstrup, and W. Weder Tissue-engineered trachea: History, problems and the future Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., November 1, 2006; 30(5): 782 - 786. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]