ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Maxey, T. S.
Right arrow Articles by Kron, I. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Maxey, T. S.
Right arrow Articles by Kron, I. L.
Related Collections
Right arrow Myocardial infarction

Ann Thorac Surg 2003;76:1571-1575
© 2003 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons


Original article: cardiovascular

The beating heart approach is not necessary for the Dor procedure

Thomas S. Maxey, MDa, T. Brett Reece, MDa, Peter I. Ellman, MDa, John A. Kern, MDa, Curtis G. Tribble, MDa, Irving L. Kron, MDa*

a Division of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Virginia Health Science Center, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA

* Address reprint requests to Dr Kron, Department of Surgery, University of Virginia Health Science Center, Box 801359, Charlottesville, VA 22908, USA.
e-mail: ikron{at}virginia.edu

Presented at the Forty-ninth Annual Meeting of the Southern Thoracic Surgical Association, Miami Beach, FL, Nov 7–9, 2002.

BACKGROUND: Ventricular reconstruction using the Dor technique has been demonstrated to improve outcome in patients with dilated left ventricles. It has been suggested that a beating heart approach improves ventricular function by allowing the surgeon to palpate that part of the ventricle to exclude.

METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent an endoventricular circular patch plasty (Dor procedure) between 1998 and 2001. All patients who received ventricular restoration, with or without revascularization or valve repair, were included in the analysis. Discrete left ventricular aneurysms were excluded. Patients were divided into two groups: group 1 (n = 15) underwent ventricular reconstruction with the beating heart technique, whereas group 2 (n = 38) underwent restoration with the aorta cross-clamped. Clinical and hemodynamic data were collected from medical records and computerized databases and compared between the two groups.

RESULTS: Fifty-three patients underwent endoventricular circular patch plasty. All patients had enlarged ventricles (echocardiogram demonstrating unidimensional end-diastolic diameter >= 6.0 cm) and echocardiographic evidence of severe left ventricular dysfunction (mean ejection fraction: group 1 = 21.4%; group 2 = 23.4%). No operative mortalities occurred in either group and all patients were discharged home alive (mean postoperative hospital stay 8.3 days [6 to 22 days]). All patients had improvement in left ventricular function with mean postoperative left ventricular ejection fraction of 36.9% (25% to 52%) in group 1 versus 38.1% (31% to 50%) in group 2, p = 0.081. Ventricular arrhythmias occurred in 5 of 15 group 1 patients and in 9 of 38 group 2 patients. Two patients in the entire cohort (1 patient in group 1, and 1 patient in group 2) had at least one readmission within 12 months with evidence of heart failure. The group 1 patient went on to successful transplant 11 months later, whereas the group 2 patient died 10 months later.

CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate that the Dor technique of ventricular restoration significantly improves left ventricular function and the beating heart approach provides no additional advantage over continuous aortic cross clamping.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
P. Totaro, A. Alloni, B. Cattadori, C. Monterosso, A. Degani, M. Maurelli, A. M. D'Armini, and M. Vigano
Minimally Invasive Heart-Port Assisted Technique as Standard First Choice Approach for Left Ventricle Endoplasty: A Ten-Year Single-Center Experience
Ann. Thorac. Surg., April 1, 2010; 89(4): 1200 - 1203.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Interact CardioVasc Thorac SurgHome page
A. D'Onofrio, D. Cugola, I. Bolgan, L. Menicanti, A. Fabbri, and M. Di Donato
Surgical ventricular reconstruction with different myocardial protection strategies. A propensity matched analysis
Interact CardioVasc Thorac Surg, April 1, 2010; 10(4): 530 - 534.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J Cardiothorac SurgHome page
C. Athanasuleas, W. Siler, G. Buckberg, and the RESTORE Group
Myocardial protection during surgical ventricular restoration
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, April 1, 2006; 29(Supplement_1): S231 - S237.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch SurgHome page
I. L. Kron
Mixter Lecture: Changing Clinical Practice in Surgery
Arch Surg, April 1, 2005; 140(4): 368 - 370.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
V. Dor
Left ventricular reconstruction: The aim and the reality after twenty years
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., July 1, 2004; 128(1): 17 - 20.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
P. Fundaro, A. Moneta, and E. Vitali
Which is the best surgical strategy for "complete" treatment of ischemic cardiomyopathy?
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., July 1, 2004; 128(1): 156 - 157.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 2003 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.