ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Albes, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Wahlers, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Albes, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Wahlers, T.
Related Collections
Right arrow Valve disease
Right arrowRelated Article

Ann Thorac Surg 2003;76:1564-1570
© 2003 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons


Original Articles: Cardiovascular

Are mechanical valves with enhanced inner diameter advantageous in the small sized aortic annulus?

Johannes M. Albes, MDa*, Martin Hartrumpf, MDa, Volker Rudolph, MDa, Tanja Krempl, MDa, Egbert Hüttemann, MDb, Rüdiger Vollandt, PhDc, Thorsten Wahlers, MDa

a Departments of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Jena, Germany
b Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine,, Jena, Germany
c and Medical Statistics and Documentation, Friedrich-Schiller-University Hospital Jena, Jena, Germany

Accepted for publication April 18, 2003.

* Address reprint requests to Dr Albes, Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Heart-Center-Brandenburg, Ladeburger Strasse 17, 16321, Bernau, Germany
e-mail: j.albes{at}immanuel.de

BACKGROUND: Mechanical bileaflet valves with enhanced inner diameter may offer superior hemodynamic properties in patients with a small aortic annulus. The aim of this clinical study was to compare these valves with standard bileaflet prostheses in vivo.

METHODS: Mechanical aortic valve replacement for combined stenosis and regurgitation was performed in 47 patients with standard CarboMedics prostheses (CM: 21 mm, 23 mm, 25 mm) and two types of diameter enhanced St. Jude Medical prostheses (SJM-AHPJ: 21 mm, 23 mm, 25 mm; SJM-Regent: 21 mm, 23 mm). Transvalvular mean gradients (TVG) were assessed intraoperatively by means of transesophageal echocardiography (TVGTEE) and simultaneous direct pressure monitoring of the left ventricle and the ascending aorta (TVGCATH), as well as early (3 months) and late (9 months) postoperatively by means of transthoracic echocardiography (TVGTTE). Left ventricular muscle mass was assessed preoperatively, early, and late postoperatively to evaluate remodeling capacity.

RESULTS: In all valve types and sizes, both TVG assessments exhibited consistent findings. Small-sized conventional valves of 21 mm showed a marked initial TVG. In contrast, both valve types with enhanced inner diameter exhibited significantly lower TVG comparable with those achieved with larger valves (TVGCATH CM 21 mm, 15.6 ± 3.9 mm Hg; SJM-AHPJ 21 mm, 11.9 ± 1.6 mm Hg; SJM-Regent 21 mm, 9.9 ± 1.1 mm Hg; CM 23 mm, 7.8 ± 0.8 mm Hg; SJM-AHPJ 23 mm, 7.7 ± 1.4 mm Hg; SJM-Regent 23 mm, 9.5 ± 1.8 mm Hg). During the postoperative course TVG remained constant in all valve types and sizes. Left ventricular muscle mass, however, diminished markedly in all valves without exhibiting significant differences between size matched valve types.

CONCLUSIONS: In patients with a small aortic annulus, who require a 21-mm valve, diameter-enhanced prostheses provide lower transvalvular gradients than conventional valves. However, in the intermediate clinical course, appropriate left ventricular remodeling occurred in all patients independent of the size and the type of the valve.


Related Article

Invited commentary
W.R. Eric Jamieson
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2003 76: 1570. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ICVTSHome page
R. Garcia Fuster, V. Estevez, I. Rodriguez, S. Canovas, O. Gil, F. Hornero, and J. Martinez-Leon
Prosthesis patient mismatch with latest generation supra-annular prostheses. The beginning of the end?
Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, August 1, 2007; 6(4): 462 - 469.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
R.-U. Kuehnel, R. Puchner, A. Pohl, M. O. Wendt, M. Hartrumpf, M. Pohl, and J. M. Albes
Characteristic resistance curves of aortic valve substitutes facilitate individualized decision for a particular type
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., March 1, 2005; 27(3): 450 - 455.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 2003 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.