ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Glance, L. G.
Right arrow Articles by Osler, T. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Glance, L. G.
Right arrow Articles by Osler, T. M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Coronary disease

Ann Thorac Surg 2003;76:1155-1162
© 2003 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons


Original article: cardiovascular

Is the hospital volume-mortality relationship in coronary artery bypass surgery the same for low-risk versus high-risk patients?

Laurent G. Glance, MDa*, Andrew W. Dick, PhDb, Dana B. Mukamel, PhDc, Turner M. Osler, MD, FACSd

a Department of Anesthesiology, University of Rochester Medical Center, School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York, USA
b Department of Community and Preventive Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York, USA
c Department of Health Policies, University of Rochester Medical Center, School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York, , USA
d Department of Surgery, The University of Vermont College of Medicine, Burlington, Vermont, USA

Accepted for publication May 9, 2003.

* Address reprint requests to Dr Glance, Department of Anesthesiology, University of Rochester Medical Center, 601 Elmwood Ave, Box 604, Rochester, NY 14642, USA
e-mail: laurent_glance{at}urmc.rochester.edu

BACKGROUND: There is evidence to support the existence of an inverse relation between mortality after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery and procedure volume. It is unclear whether all patients benefit equally from having CABG surgery performed at high-volume centers. The objective of this study was to determine whether the volume-outcome association for CABG surgery is modified by patient risk.

METHODS: This retrospective cohort analysis was conducted using data from the Cardiac Surgery Reporting System database on all patients (20,078) undergoing CABG surgery in New York State who were discharged in 1996. The main outcome measure was in-hospital mortality as a function of procedure volume after adjusting for severity of disease. Logistic regression modeling was used to explore the interaction between patient risk and procedure volume.

RESULTS: There is a significant interaction between procedure volume and patient risk (p = 0.01). The final model exhibits excellent discrimination (C statistic = 0.818) and goodness-of-fit (Hosmer-Lemeshow statistic = 6.02; p = 0.645). Very low (<0.5%) and low-risk (0.5%–2.0%) patients exhibit a greater reduction in CABG mortality than high (5.0%–10.0%) and very high risk (>10%) patients at high-volume centers relative to low-volume centers. Among the highest risk patients (>25% risk of mortality), higher risk patients have better outcomes at higher volume centers.

CONCLUSIONS: For the vast majority of patients, low-risk patients benefit significantly more than high-risk patients from undergoing CABG surgery at high-volume centers instead of at low-volume centers. Low-risk patients benefit significantly more than high-risk patients from undergoing CABG surgery at high-volume centers instead of at low-volume centers. However, before generalizing these findings to other states, this study should be repeated using other regional population-based clinical databases.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Int J Qual Health CareHome page
L. G. Glance, T. M. Osler, D. B. Mukamel, and A. W. Dick
Estimating the potential impact of regionalizing health care delivery based on volume standards versus risk-adjusted mortality rate
Int. J. Qual. Health Care, August 1, 2007; 19(4): 195 - 202.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
E. Losina, E. A. Wright, C. L. Kessler, J. A. Barrett, A. H. Fossel, A. H. Creel, N. N. Mahomed, J. A. Baron, and J. N. Katz
Neighborhoods Matter: Use of Hospitals With Worse Outcomes Following Total Knee Replacement by Patients From Vulnerable Populations
Arch Intern Med, January 22, 2007; 167(2): 182 - 186.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
J. H. Liu, D. S. Zingmond, M. L. McGory, N. F. SooHoo, S. L. Ettner, R. H. Brook, and C. Y. Ko
Disparities in the utilization of high-volume hospitals for complex surgery.
JAMA, October 25, 2006; 296(16): 1973 - 1980.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
K. F. Welke, M. J. Barnett, M. S. Vaughan Sarrazin, and G. E. Rosenthal
Limitations of Hospital Volume as a Measure of Quality of Care for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery
Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 2005; 80(6): 2114 - 2119.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
B. K. Nallamothu, K. A. Eagle, V. A. Ferraris, and R. M. Sade
Should Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Be Regionalized?
Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 2005; 80(5): 1572 - 1581.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
R. H. Jones
The year in cardiovascular surgery
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 5, 2004; 43(9): 1706 - 1714.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 2003 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.