HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Author home page(s): Cornelius Borst Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by van Andel, C. J. Articles by Borst, C. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by van Andel, C. J. Articles by Borst, C. Related Collections Coronary disease

Ann Thorac Surg 2003;76:58-64
© 2003 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons

---

Original article: cardiovascular

Mechanical properties of porcine and human arteries: implications for coronary anastomotic connectors

^a Experimental Cardiology Laboratory, Heart Lung Center Utrecht, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
^b Department of Design, Engineering and Production, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands

Accepted for publication February 4, 2003.

^* Address reprint requests to Dr Borst, Experimental Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Room G02.523, Heart Lung Center Utrecht, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands.
e-mail: c.borst{at}hli.azu.nl

BACKGROUND: To determine whether the pig is an appropriate experimental animal for studies on distal anastomotic connectors in coronary artery bypass surgery, the mechanical properties of young porcine and old human coronary and internal mammary arteries were compared within and beyond the physiologic range of strains.

METHODS: Coronary arteries from 6 humans and 8 pigs were studied as well as internal mammary arteries of 3 humans and 6 pigs (human, aged 61 to 85 years; pig, 78.7 ± 5.8 kg [mean ± SD]). Pressure-diameter, pressure-axial force, circumferential and axial stress-strain relations, and dimensions were measured.

RESULTS: The dimensions of the porcine and human coronary and internal mammary artery were generally similar but wall thickness was smaller in the porcine internal mammary artery (0.35 ± 0.07 mm versus 0.71 ± 0.06 mm, respectively, p = 0.002). The porcine internal mammary artery wall was less elastic than the coronary artery wall, whereas in humans both arteries displayed similar elasticity. Overall the porcine arteries were far more elastic in both circumferential and axial direction compared with the human arteries. Consequently the porcine arteries could be safely stretched by 60% to 70% compared with about 20% for the human arteries before reaching their maximum circumferential strain.

CONCLUSIONS: The three times greater elasticity of porcine compared with human coronary and internal mammary artery walls may result in underestimation of wall stress and the risk of wall injury when coronary connectors that involve overstretching of the wall are evaluated in the pig.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				G. A. Holzapfel, G. Sommer, C. T. Gasser, and P. Regitnig Determination of layer-specific mechanical properties of human coronary arteries with nonatherosclerotic intimal thickening and related constitutive modeling Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, November 1, 2005; 289(5): H2048 - H2058. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]