HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Author home page(s): Hari R. Mallidi Marc P. Pelletier George T. Christakis Bernard S. Goldman Stephen E. Fremes Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Fazel, S. Articles by Fremes, S. E. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Fazel, S. Articles by Fremes, S. E. Related Collections Coronary disease

Ann Thorac Surg 2003;75:1414-1421
© 2003 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons

---

Original article: cardiovascular

Radial artery use is safe in patients with moderate to severe left ventricular dysfunction

^a Division of Cardiac Surgery, Schulich Heart Centre, Sunnybrook and Women’s College Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
^b Heart and Stroke Richard Lewar Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Accepted for publication December 11, 2002.

^* Address reprint requests to Dr Fremes, Sunnybrook and Women’s College Health Sciences Centre, 2075 Bayview Ave, Room H410, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M4N 3M5.
e-mail: stephen.fremes{at}swchsc.on.ca

BACKGROUND: Using radial artery grafts in patients with moderate to severe left ventricular dysfunction (LVD; ejection fraction < 35%) has been discouraged for the fear that postoperative vasopressor support may cause graft spasm and lead to ischemic complications. We, therefore, examined the safety of radial grafts in aortocoronary bypass (ACB) patients with LVD.

METHODS: Data were collected from 5,455 patients who underwent isolated ACB between January 1995 and September 2001. One thousand eight hundred three patients received a radial artery graft (RadACB), and 3,652 patients did not (NoRadACB). Three hundred seven RadACB, and 819 NoRadACB operations were performed in LVD patients. A matched (age, sex, urgency of operation, diabetes, and renal insufficiency) cohort analysis was performed in LVD patients. Univariate and logistic regression analyses were performed in the entire population and the unmatched RadACB and NoRadACB patient subgroups to examine the effect of radial artery use on postoperative death or myocardial infarction rate.

RESULTS: The matched cohort analysis revealed a similar rate of death or myocardial infarction (RadACB, 11 of 242 patients; NoRadACB, 16 of 242 patients; p = 0.32). Left ventricular dysfunction was associated with a higher rate of death or myocardial infarction in both unmatched groups (RadACB, odds ratio, 2.36; 95% confidence interval, 1.38 to 4.58; p = 0.004; NoRadACB, odds ratio, 1.62; 95% confidence interval, 1.18 to 2.24; p < 0.001) and in the entire population (odds ratio, 1.77; 95% confidence interval, 1.32 to 2.35; p = 0.003). An interaction term for patients with LVD and a radial artery graft, which was forced into the logistic regression model for the entire population, was not predictive of death or myocardial infarction (odds ratio, 1.52; 95% confidence interval, 0.75 to 3.10; p = 0.25).

CONCLUSIONS: Left ventricular dysfunction carries similar risk for postoperative death or myocardial infarction in RadACB and NoRadACB patients. The presence of LVD in isolation is not a contraindication to the use of radial grafting.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. Fazel, R. D. Weisel, and S. Verma A novel technique to assess flow-mediated vasodilation J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 6, 2004; 44(7): 1478 - 1480. [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Verma, P. E. Szmitko, R. D. Weisel, D. Bonneau, D. Latter, L. Errett, Y. LeClerc, and S. E. Fremes Should Radial Arteries Be Used Routinely for Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting? Circulation, August 3, 2004; 110(5): e40 - e46. [Full Text] [PDF]