ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Thorsten N.H. Drews
Matthias Loebe
Michael J. Jurmann
Roland Hetzer
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Drews, T. N.H.
Right arrow Articles by Hetzer, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Drews, T. N.H.
Right arrow Articles by Hetzer, R.
Related Collections
Right arrow Mechanical Circulatory Assistance

Ann Thorac Surg 2003;75:780-785
© 2003 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons


Original article: cardiovascular

Outpatients on mechanical circulatory support

Thorsten N.H. Drews, MDa*, Matthias Loebe, MD, PhDb,a, Michael J. Jurmann, MDa, Yuguo Weng, MD, PhDa, Christoph Wendelmutha, Roland Hetzer, MD, PhDa

a Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Deutsches Herzzentrum Berlin, Berlin, Germany
b Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Division of Transplantation and Assist Devices, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA

* Address reprint requests to Dr Drews, Deutsches Herzzentrum Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany.
e-mail: dr.drews{at}berlin.de

Presented at the Thirty-eighth Annual Meeting of The Society of Thoracic Surgeons, Fort Lauderdale, FL, Jan 28–30, 2002.

BACKGROUND: As waiting periods for heart transplantation have lengthened, the application of long-term mechanical circulatory support (MCS) has become more common in patients presenting with cardiogenic shock. Anticipating increased long-term MCS, a policy to discharge patients home has been instituted. This study compares the results of outpatient on MCS to a group of patients remaining hospitalized.

METHODS: We report our 10-year experience with 108 patients on MCS, who were supported for more than 3 months. Group A consisted of 38 patients (25 Novacor, 13 Berlin Heart) who underwent assist implantation from 1996 to 2001. They had a mean support time of 454 days (range 100 to 1074 days) and spent a mean of 326 days (range 20 to 769 days) at home. Group B consisted of 70 patients (24 Novacor, 46 Berlin Heart) who underwent assist implantation between 1991 and 2000. They had a mean support time of 234 days (range 95 to 795 days) and were not discharged. The patients were monitored for complications, hospital readmissions, and causes of death including infections and thromboembolic and bleeding events during the MCS time.

RESULTS: Group A total mortality was 16% (6/38). Two patients died from cerebral embolism, one from cerebral hemorrhage, two from systemic infection, and one from multiorgan failure. Thirty-two patients (84%) required 95 readmissions to the hospital due to cerebral embolism (n = 9), bleeding (n = 1), wound infections (n = 23), coagulation disorder (n = 13) for heart transplantation (n = 5), and (n = 44). In group B the mortality was 43% (30/70) for noncardiac reasons and thus significant higher (p = 0.004, {chi}2 test). Causes of death were cerebral embolism (n = 5), cerebral hemorrhage (n = 7), systemic infection (n = 14, significantly higher, p = 0.04, {chi}2 test), and multiorgan failure (n = 4).

CONCLUSIONS: Our experience demonstrates that MCS can be used in outpatients without increased mortality and with an acceptable rate of readmissions (2.8/patient). It ensures the survival of the patient, enables recovery from multiorgan failure, and offers an acceptable quality of life.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
A. Tschirkov, D. Nikolov, and V. Papantchev
New technique for implantation of the inflow canula of Berlin Heart INCOR system.
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., October 1, 2006; 30(4): 678 - 679.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
D. Loisance
Mechanical circulatory support systems--future opportunities
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., December 1, 2004; 26(Suppl_1): S48 - S53.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
M. J. Jurmann, Y. Weng, T. Drews, M. Pasic, E. Hennig, and R. Hetzer
Permanent mechanical circulatory support in patients of advanced age
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., April 1, 2004; 25(4): 610 - 618.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
A.-M. McMahon, C. van Doorn, M. Burch, P. Whitmore, S. Neligan, P. Rees, R. Radley-Smith, A. Goldman, K. Brown, G. Cohen, et al.
Improved early outcome for end-stage dilated cardiomyopathy in children
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., January 1, 2004; 126(6): 1781 - 1787.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
O.H. Frazier and R. M. Delgado
Mechanical Circulatory Support for Advanced Heart Failure: Where Does It Stand in 2003?
Circulation, December 23, 2003; 108(25): 3064 - 3068.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 2003 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.