HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Author home page(s): Toshihiro Takaba Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Yamada, M. Articles by Takaba, T. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Yamada, M. Articles by Takaba, T. Related Collections Electrophysiology - arrhythmias

Ann Thorac Surg 2002;74:1494-1499
© 2002 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons

---

Original article: cardiovascular

Surgical lead-preserving procedures for pacemaker pocket infection

^a The First Department of Surgery, Showa University, Tokyo, Japan

Accepted for publication June 26, 2002.

* Address reprint requests to Dr Yamada, The First Department of Surgery, Showa University, 1-5-8 Hatanodai, Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo 142-8666, Japan.
e-mail: dayama{at}med.showa-u.ac.jp

BACKGROUND: In the treatment of pacemaker pocket infection, removal of the entire pacing system has been considered necessary to avoid recurrent infection. We report a series of patients treated surgically by our lead-preserving procedures.

METHODS: Between 1990 and 2001, a total of 18 patients underwent one of two types of lead-preserving procedures. Procedure 1 preserves the full length of the lead, and procedure 2 preserves only the distal part of the lead. Signs of bacteremia, endocarditis, or purulent material within the lead insulation preclude application of these procedures in patients with potential or definite pacemaker pocket infection.

RESULTS: Seventeen patients who met the indications for our procedures were discharged 7 to 14 days (8.9 ± 2.4 days, mean ± SD) postoperatively without signs of infection and were followed up for a total of 987 patient-months until the close of the study or death without recurrent infection. The remaining 1 patient, who did not meet the indications, suffered reinfection soon after the operation.

CONCLUSIONS: The follow-up data suggest that our lead-preserving procedures should be considered as alternatives to conventional removal of the entire pacing system in cases of pocket infection that meet specific criteria.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				F. L. Pimpec-Barthes, J.-P. Hubsch, S. Payelleville, and T. Similowski Successful reimplantation of a phrenic nerve stimulator after traumatic exteriorisation Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., January 1, 2006; 29(1): 117 - 118. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D Klug, F Wallet, D Lacroix, C Marquie, C Kouakam, S Kacet, and R Courcol Local symptoms at the site of pacemaker implantation indicate latent systemic infection Heart, August 1, 2004; 90(8): 882 - 886. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. M. Kojic and R. O. Darouiche Candida Infections of Medical Devices Clin. Microbiol. Rev., April 1, 2004; 17(2): 255 - 267. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Yamada and T. Takaba Preserving infected pacemaker systems: Reply Ann. Thorac. Surg., April 1, 2004; 77(4): 1505 - 1505. [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. A. Dieter Jr Preserving infected pacemaker systems Ann. Thorac. Surg., April 1, 2004; 77(4): 1504 - 1505. [Full Text] [PDF]

				F.A.L.E. Bracke, A Meijer, and L.M. van Gelder Lead extraction for device related infections: a single-centre experience Europace, January 1, 2004; 6(3): 243 - 247. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]