HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Author home page(s): Eric D. Peterson Fred H. Edwards Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Peterson, E. D. Articles by Edwards, F. H. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Peterson, E. D. Articles by Edwards, F. H. Related Collections Coronary disease

Ann Thorac Surg 2002;74:464-473
© 2002 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons

---

Original article: cardiovascular

Hospital variability in length of stay after coronary artery bypass surgery: results from the Society of Thoracic Surgeon’s National Cardiac Database

^a The Outcomes Research and Assessment Group, The Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA
^b Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
^c Departments of Surgery and Medicine, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, Colorado, USA
^d University of Florida Health Science Center, Jacksonville, Florida, USA

Accepted for publication April 16, 2002.

* Address reprint requests to Dr Peterson, Associate Professor of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3236, Durham, NC, USA27710
e-mail: peter016{at}mc.duke.edu

Background. There is growing interest in comparing resource, as well as patient outcome metrics among coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) providers, yet few tools exist for adjusting these provider comparisons for patient case-mix. In this study, we aimed to define the magnitude of hospital variability in postoperative length of stay (PLOS) in contemporary practice and to determine the degree to which this variability was accounted for by differences in patient case-mix. We also sought to determine the relationship between hospitals’ risk-adjusted PLOS and mortality outcomes.

Methods. We analyzed 496,797 isolated CABG procedures performed between January 1997 to January 2001 at 587 US hospitals participating in the Society of Thoracic Surgeon’s National Cardiac Database. Logistic and linear regression were used to identify independent preoperative factors affecting a patient’s likelihood for early discharge (PLOS 5 day), prolonged stay (>14 days), and overall PLOS. Hierarchical models were used to determine the degree to which hospital factors influenced PLOS beyond patient factors.

Results. Overall, 53% of CABG patients were discharged within 5 days of CABG, whereas 5% required prolonged (>14 days) stays. More than 25 preoperative patient factors were independently associated with a patients’ likelihood for early discharge and prolonged stay (model C index 0.70 and 0.75, respectively). After adjusting for patient factors, however, there remained wide unexplained variability among hospitals in PLOS and limited correlation between these PLOS metrics and hospitals’ risk-adjusted mortality results (Spearman correlation coefficient -0.15 and 0.35).

Conclusions. Our study provides a method for institutions to receive meaningful risk-adjusted bypass PLOS information. Given the marked variability among hospitals in CABG PLOS, institutions should consider benchmarking metrics of efficiency, as well as patient outcomes.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L. Dos, A. Dadashev, D. Tanous, I. J. Ferreira-Gonzalez, K. Haberer, S. C. Siu, G. S. Van Arsdell, E. N. Oechslin, W. G. Williams, and C. K. Silversides Pulmonary valve replacement in repaired tetralogy of Fallot: Determinants of early postoperative adverse outcomes J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., September 1, 2009; 138(3): 553 - 559. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. A. Kramer and J. E. Zimmerman Predicting Outcomes for Cardiac Surgery Patients After Intensive Care Unit Admission Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, September 1, 2008; 12(3): 175 - 183. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E. Ott, C. D. Mazer, I. C. Tudor, L. Shore-Lesserson, S. A. Snyder-Ramos, B. A. Finegan, P. Mohnle, C. B. Hantler, B. W. Bottiger, R. D. Latimer, et al. Coronary artery bypass graft surgery care globalization: The impact of national care on fatal and nonfatal outcome J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., May 1, 2007; 133(5): 1242 - 1251. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Abrahamyan, A. Demirchyan, M. E Thompson, and H. Hovaguimian Determinants of Morbidity and Intensive Care Unit Stay after Coronary Surgery Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, April 1, 2006; 14(2): 114 - 118. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Determinants of operative mortality in valvular heart surgery. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., March 1, 2006; 131(3): 547 - 557.

				D. M. Shahian, E. H. Blackstone, F. H. Edwards, F. L. Grover, G. L. Grunkemeier, D. C. Naftel, S. A.M. Nashef, W. C. Nugent, and E. D. Peterson Cardiac Surgery Risk Models: A Position Article Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 2004; 78(5): 1868 - 1877. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Weissman Pulmonary Complications After Cardiac Surgery Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, September 1, 2004; 8(3): 185 - 211. [Abstract] [PDF]

				T. B. Ferguson Jr, E. D. Peterson, L. P. Coombs, M. C. Eiken, M. L. Carey, F. L. Grover, and E. R. DeLong Use of Continuous Quality Improvement to Increase Use of Process Measures in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial JAMA, July 2, 2003; 290(1): 49 - 56. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. M. Mentzer Jr, R. D. Lasley, A. Jessel, and M. Karmazyn Intracellular sodium hydrogen exchange inhibition and clinical myocardial protection Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2003; 75(2): S700 - 708. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]