ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
James D. Luketich
Hiran C. Fernando
Neil A. Christie
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Luketich, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Schauer, P. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Luketich, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Schauer, P. R.
Related Collections
Right arrow Esophagus - other

Ann Thorac Surg 2002;74:328-332
© 2002 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons


Original article: general thoracic

Outcomes after minimally invasive reoperation for gastroesophageal reflux disease

James D. Luketich, MD*a, Hiran C. Fernando, FRCS, FRCSEda, Neil A. Christie, FRCS(C)a, Percival O. Buenaventura, MDa, Sayeed Ikramuddin, MDa, Philip R. Schauer, MDa

a Division of Thoracic and Foregut Surgery and Minimally Invasive Surgery Center, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Health System, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA

* Address reprint requests to Dr Luketich, Division of Thoracic and Foregut Surgery, UPMC Presbyterian, 200 Lothrop St, Suite C-800, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
e-mail: luketichjd{at}msx.upmc.edu

Presented at the Forty-eighth Annual Meeting of the Southern Thoracic Surgical Association, San Antonio, TX, Nov 8–10, 2001.

Background. Reoperative antireflux surgery is complex and traditionally performed by open methods. Increasingly, surgeons are performing minimally invasive reoperations. This report summarizes our experience with laparoscopic reoperative antireflux surgery (LRAS).

Methods. A retrospective review (1996 to 2001) identified 80 LRAS cases. Median age was 49 (22 to 80) years with 52 females and 28 males. Primary symptoms included heartburn (53%), regurgitation (22%), and dysphagia (25%). Detailed outcomes recorded at follow-up included heartburn severity using the Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease-Health Related Quality of Life scale (HRQOL) and SF36 physical (PCS) and mental (MCS) component summary scores.

Results. LRAS was completed in 97.5% of cases (two conversions). The most common problems identified were mediastinal migration of the wrap in 48 (60%) and misplaced wrap in 11 (13.8%). LRAS operations included Collis-Nissen (42), Nissen (26), Toupet (six), and six others. Pyloroplasty was required in nine (11%). Complications occurred in 16 patients. These included nine minor gastric perforations (all repaired intraoperatively) and two reoperations for complications (1 patient with a bile leak and the second with a pyloroplasty site leak). Median length of stay was 2.5 days. Median follow-up was 18 (1 to 52) months; 18 (23%) required proton-pump inhibitors. Detailed outcomes were available in 50 patients. Mean PCS and MCS scores were 42 and 47, respectively (normals = 50). HRQOL scores were excellent in 35 (65%), satisfactory in 9 (17%), and poor in 10 (18%). Ten patients (18%) reported that they were dissatisfied.

Conclusions. LRAS can be performed safely with complication and success rates similar to open operations in a center with extensive laparoscopic experience.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
O. Awais, J. D. Luketich, J. Tam, K. Irshad, M. J. Schuchert, R. J. Landreneau, and A. Pennathur
Roux-en-Y near esophagojejunostomy for intractable gastroesophageal reflux after antireflux surgery.
Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 2008; 85(6): 1954 - 1959.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
J. D. Luketich and A. Pennathur
How to Keep the Treatment of Esophageal Disease in the Surgeon's Hands
Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2008; 85(2): S760 - S763.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
A. Nieponice, T. W. Gilbert, and S. F. Badylak
Reinforcement of Esophageal Anastomoses With an Extracellular Matrix Scaffold in a Canine Model
Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 2006; 82(6): 2050 - 2058.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
H. C. Fernando, J. D. Luketich, J. Samphire, M. Alvelo-Rivera, N. A. Christie, P. O. Buenaventura, and R. J. Landreneau
Minimally Invasive Operation for Esophageal Diverticula
Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 2005; 80(6): 2076 - 2080.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
O. A. Khan, G. Kanellopoulos, M. L. Field, K. R. Knowles, F. D. Beggs, W. E. Morgan, and J. P. Duffy
Redo antireflux surgery--the importance of a tailored approach
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., November 1, 2004; 26(5): 875 - 880.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 2002 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.