|
|
||||||||
Ann Thorac Surg 2002;73:1830-1836
© 2002 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
a Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, General Hospital "S. Maria Della Misericordia," Udine, Italy
Accepted for publication December 10, 2001.
* Address reprint requests to Dr Gelsomino, U. O. Cardiotoracica, Azienda Ospedaliera S. Maria Della Misericordia, Piazzale S. Maria Della Misericordia 11, 33100 Udine, Italy
e-mail: sandrogelsomino{at}virgilio.it
Background. The St. Jude Medical Regent is a new generation mechanical aortic valve.
Methods. Between March 2000 and July 2001, this valve was implanted in the aortic position in 40 patients (21 men; mean age 59.1 ± 9.0 years). Preoperatively, 24 patients (60%) were in New York Heart Association functional class III or IV. Eighteen patients (45%) underwent associated procedures. Mean valve size was 21.4 ± 2.4 mm. The mean duration of follow-up was 8.5 ± 4.5 months (range, 1 to 16 months).
Results. There were no operative deaths. Early complications included one reoperation for bleeding and one transient low output syndrome. Valve replacement was followed by a significant reduction in mean and peak transaortic gradients over time (p < 0.001) and analysis of variance failed to demonstrate statistical differences between valve size over time (p = not significant). A significant reduction in left ventricular hypertrophy occurred over time (p = 0.01) in all valve sizes (p = not significant between groups): baseline left ventricular mass index was 194 g/cm2; it reduced by 22 g/cm2 (p = 0.006) at discharge. Left ventricular mass index decreased from 172 ± 55 g/cm2 to 156 ± 44 g/cm2 (p = 0.03) from discharge to 2 months. Further reductions were not significant. Relative wall thickness decreased from 0.57 ± 0.13 preoperatively to 0.42 ± 0.06 at discharge (p = 0.001), and again at 2 months (-0.2; p = not significant), and at 1 year (-0.02; p = not significant).
Conclusions. The early experience with the St. Jude Medical Regent valve has been satisfactory.
Related Article
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2002 73: 1836.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. W. Emery, A. M. Emery, A. Knutsen, and G. V. Raikar Aortic Valve Replacement with a Mechanical Cardiac Valve Prosthesis Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2008; 3(2008): 841 - 856. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
R. Haaverstad, N. Vitale, A. Karevold, G. Cappabianca, A. Tromsdal, P. S. Olsen, L. Kober, H. Ihlen, K. A. Rein, and J. L Svennevig Clinical and echocardiographic assessment of the Medtronic Advantage aortic valve prosthesis: the Scandinavian multicentre, prospective study Heart, April 1, 2007; 93(4): 500 - 505. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Amarelli, A. Della Corte, G. Romano, G. Iasevoli, G. Dialetto, L. S. De Santo, M. De Feo, M. Torella, M. Scardone, and M. Cotrufo Left ventricular mass regression after aortic valve replacement with 17-mm St Jude Medical mechanical prostheses in isolated aortic stenosis J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., March 1, 2005; 129(3): 512 - 517. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |