HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Author home page(s): Jean F. Morin Hani Shennib Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Endo, M. Articles by Shennib, H. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Endo, M. Articles by Shennib, H.

Ann Thorac Surg 2002;73:1000-1001
© 2002 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons

---

How to do it

Avoiding aortic clamping during coronary artery bypass using an automated anastomotic device

^a Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Accepted for publication October 24, 2001.

* Address reprint requests to Dr Shennib, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, McGill University Health Center, 1650 Cedar Ave, Room L9-122, Montreal, Quebec H3G 1A4, Canada
e-mail: hani.shennib{at}muhc.mcgill.ca

In its current application, off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB) requires clamping of the aorta to perform the proximal anastomosis. One of the important theoretical advantages of OPCAB is to avoid the undesirable effects of cross-clamping of the aorta. We report our early experience with a technique of no aortic clamping using the St. Jude aortic connector system in 11 patients.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. G. Kachhy, D. F. Kong, E. Honeycutt, L. K. Shaw, and R. D. Davis Long-Term Outcomes of the Symmetry Vein Graft Anastomosis Device: A Matched Case-Control Analysis Circulation, July 4, 2006; 114(1_suppl): I-425 - I-429. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. S. F. Fischer, B. Phillips-Bute, M. Swaminathan, C. Milano, and M. Stafford-Smith SymmetryTM Aortic Connector Devices and Acute Renal Injury: A Comparison of Renal Dysfunction After Three Different Aortocoronary Bypass Surgery Techniques Anesth. Analg., January 1, 2006; 102(1): 25 - 31. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Kitamura, H. Okabayashi, M. Hanyu, Y. Soga, T. Nomoto, H. Johno, J. Nakano, T. Matsuo, M. Kai, and E. Umehara Early and midterm patency of the proximal anastomoses of saphenous vein grafts made with a Symmetry Aortic Connector System J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., October 1, 2005; 130(4): 1028 - 1031. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Kitamura, H. Okabayashi, M. Hanyu, J. Nakano, S. Kono, T. Nomoto, A. Nagasawa, H. Sakaguchi, H. Johno, and T. Matsuo Early Results and Problems with St. Jude Medical Symmetry Bypass System in Japan Asian Cardiovascular and Thoracic Annals, September 1, 2004; 12(3): 236 - 238. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. M. Dewey, K. Crumrine, M. A. Herbert, A. Leonard, S. L. Prince, C. Worley, J. R. Edgerton, M. J. Magee, and M. J. Mack First-year outcomes of beating heart coronary artery bypass grafting using proximal mechanical connectors Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 2004; 77(5): 1542 - 1549. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Verma, P. W. M. Fedak, L. Ko, R. J. Cusimano, N. A. Walton, J. D. Parker, and T. M. Yau Evaluation of a novel sutureless anastomotic connector: From endothelial function to mid-term clinical and angiographic follow-up J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., November 1, 2003; 126(5): 1555 - 1560. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. W. Hammon Aortic nightmares: Can we sleep better? J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., June 1, 2003; 125(6): 1200 - 1201. [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. M. Yau Defining the role of anastomotic devices in coronary bypass surgery J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., January 1, 2003; 125(1): 27 - 29. [Full Text] [PDF]