ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Alexander S. Geha
Malek G. Massad
Norman J. Snow
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Geha, A. S.
Right arrow Articles by Snow, N. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Geha, A. S.
Right arrow Articles by Snow, N. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Valve disease

Ann Thorac Surg 2001;72:1509-1514
© 2001 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons


Original article: cardiovascular

Replacement of degenerated mitral and aortic bioprostheses without explantation

Alexander S. Geha, MD, MS*a, Malek G. Massad, MDa, Norman J. Snow, MDa

a Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Illinois at Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA

Accepted for publication June 1, 2001.

* Address reprint requests to Dr Geha, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Illinois at Chicago Medical Center, 840 S Wood St, MC 958 Suite 417 CSB, Chicago, IL 60612, USA
e-mail: ageha{at}uic.edu

Background. The most common indication for reoperation in patients with a bioprosthetic valve is primary tissue failure. Explantation of the bioprosthesis is time consuming, and for a mitral valve, may be complicated by cardiac rupture at the atrioventricular junction or the posterior left ventricular wall where a strut is imbedded, injury to the circumflex artery, and late perivalvular leak; for an aortic valve, annular disruption and perivalvular leak may complicate explantation. A new approach to simplify these procedures and avoid these complications, by excising only the bioprosthetic tissue and attaching a bileaflet mechanical valve to the intact stent, was developed in 1991 and was evaluated over a 9-year period in 50 patients who had had one (34), two (10), three (4), or four (2) previous open cardiac operations.

Methods. Since 1991, we have replaced degenerated mitral bioprostheses in 34 patients (25 to 84 years of age; 12 male, 22 female) by preserving the stent and suturing a St. Jude or Carbomedics bileaflet valve to the atrial side of the bioprosthetic cuff; the mitral valve was exposed through a median sternotomy in 21 patients and through a right anterolateral thoracotomy in 13. Using a similar approach, starting in 1995, 16 additional patients (55 to 73 years of age; 11 male, 5 female) with degenerated aortic bioprostheses had the aortic valve replaced by excising the bioprosthetic tissue and amputating the struts, then suturing a Carbomedics valve to the aortic side of the bioprosthetic cuff. This allows the use of a bileaflet valve similar in size to the bioprosthesis with exact matching of the orifices.

Results. Bypass time averaged 61 ± 14 minutes and aortic cross-clamp time 43 ± 12 minutes. There has been no operative mortality. Three late deaths occurred at 9, 37, and 58 months, and were not valve related. No gradients of hemodynamic significance have been detected on transesophageal echocardiographic follow-up.

Conclusions. Leaving the bioprosthetic cuff intact eliminates the need for extensive dissection, thus shortening and simplifying the procedure and diminishing its attendant mortality and morbidity. This valve-on-valve approach also allows replacement of a degenerated bioprosthesis with a bileaflet valve of comparable size rather than a smaller one jammed into the orifice of the bioprosthetic stent, thus avoiding undue trauma to the bileaflet valve and maintaining excellent hemodynamic function.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
L. A. Vricella and D. E. Cameron
Facile conversion from mechanical to bioprosthetic composite aortic root replacement
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., February 1, 2007; 133(2): 565 - 567.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
K. Kurisu, Y. Ochiai, T. Kajiwara, H. Kumeda, and R. Tominaga
A modified valve-on-valve approach for aortic root replacement
Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 2003; 76(6): 2099 - 2101.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
J.-P. Chang, C.-L. Kao, K.-T. Tsai, M.-J. Hsieh, and M. Fu
Conduit-on-valve replacement of a degenerated mitral bioprosthesis with a bioprosthesis
Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 2003; 75(6): 1987 - 1989.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 2001 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.