ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Guido J. Van Nooten
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Van Nooten, G. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Van Nooten, G. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Extracorporeal circulation

Ann Thorac Surg 2001;72:S1065-S1068
© 2001 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons


Supplement: Cardiothoracic techniques and technologies

Multicenter experience with the remote access perfusion (RAP) catheter

Guido J. Van Nooten, MD, PhDa

a Heart Centre, University Hospital Ghent, Ghent, Belgium

Address reprint requests to Dr Van Nooten, Cardiac Surgery Department, University Hospital Ghent, De Pintelaan, 185, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
e-mail: guido.vannooten{at}rug.ac.be

Presented at the Seventh Annual Cardiothoracic Techniques and Technologies Meeting 2001, New Orleans, LA, Jan 24–27, 2001.

Background. Cardiac operation has rapidly evolved toward less invasive procedures. Total body perfusion from femoral or iliac vessels combined with endovascular aortic clamping can be achieved using the remote access perfusion (RAP) catheter without opening the sternum. The results of all reported RAP procedures were reviewed.

Methods. A US Food and Drug Administration/CE (Communaté Europeene) multicenter and postmark surveillance information survey from January 1999 to June 2000 evaluated 63 patients undergoing RAP procedures. The series includes coronary artery bypass grafting (46%), mitral valve operation (34%), and combined (3%) and miscellaneous procedures (17%).

Results. Since optimization of the catheter shape, easy placement was obtained during most procedures (74%). Only one procedure had to be converted to a standard approach. However, no dissection or perforation was reported. Perfusion yielded excellent flow characteristics of the RAP catheter predicted by in vitro studies. Continuous transesophageal echocardiography confirmed the stability of the endovascular balloon clamp (93%), most likely related to the near cylindrical balloon shape. In four cases an additional external cross-clamp was applied. The one reported hospital death (1.5%) was nonprocedural related. No strokes were recorded. Peripheral vascular morbidity (8%) was higher during the early period but nearly disappeared after adaptation of the catheter shape.

Conclusions. This multicenter study demonstrated the safety of the RAP technique. Excellent flow characteristics and balloon stability were obtained by improved technology. Indications will be extended in the future because of the device’s enhanced safety and feasibility.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 2001 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.