ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Guido Michielon
Loris Salvador
Uberto Da Col
Carlo Valfrè
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Michielon, G.
Right arrow Articles by Valfrè, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Michielon, G.
Right arrow Articles by Valfrè, C.
Related Collections
Right arrow Great vessels

Ann Thorac Surg 2001;72:S1059-S1064
© 2001 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons


Supplement: Cardiothoracic techniques and technologies

Modified button-Bentall operation for aortic root replacement: the miniskirt technique

Guido Michielon, MDa, Loris Salvador, MDa, Uberto Da Col, MDa, Carlo Valfrè, MDa

a Cardiac Surgery Department, Ospedale S. Maria dei Battuti, Treviso, Italy

Address reprint requests to Dr Michielon, Cardiac Surgery Department, Ospedale Bambino Gesú, P.zza S.Onofrio 4, 00165 Roma, Italy
e-mail: guido.michielon{at}tin.it

Presented at the Seventh Annual Cardiothoracic Techniques and Technologies Meeting 2001, New Orleans, LA, Jan 24–27, 2001.

Background. The aim of this study was to evaluate the midterm results of a modified button-Bentall operation (modified-bB) specifically designed to incorporate any type of prosthetic valve in composite conduit aortic root replacement.

Methods. Between 1991 and 2000, a total of 135 patients underwent modified-bB for annuloaortic ectasia (74 patients), type A dissection (31), or aortic aneurysm without dissection (30). Of these, 34 were emergencies (25.2%). A total of 50 bioprostheses (study group 1) and 85 bileaflet mechanical prostheses (study group 2) were implanted. Group 1 mean age was 66.9 ± 7.4 years versus 51.5 ± 12.1 years in group 2 (p < 0.001). Composite-conduit creation occurred during proximal suture line construction as a single-step maneuver. Interrupted extracardiac polyester mattress sutures sequentially entered the aortic annulus, the prosthetic valve ring, and the vascular graft 7 mm from its free edge (miniskirt). Running monofilament suture line secured proximal hemostasis, buttressing aortic remnants and graft edge. Coronary reimplantation was accomplished in all cases by the button technique. Concomitant procedures were performed in 51 patients (37.8%).

Results. The 30-day mortality was 5.18% (7/135 patients). Eight patients (5.9%) required revision for proximal (1 patient), coronary button (3), or distal (4) anastomosis leakage. Three patients (2.2%) perioperatively developed nonfatal inferior myocardial infarction. Kaplan-Meier 9-year survival is 91.8% ± 0.026 SE with 88.1% (95% confidence limits 71.7% to 95.5%) reoperation freedom. According to the Cox proportional hazard method, stratification of the risk for death according to prosthesis type indicates previous operation (p = 0.001) and emergency (p = 0.0465) as independent predictors of hospital mortality. Associated procedures to modified-bB increased risk of reoperation (p = 0.031).

Conclusions. Modified-bB was associated with low mortality, excellent midterm survival, and freedom from reoperation. Absence of valve-to-graft tapering, reduced coronary button anastomosis tension, and prosthesis selection according to patient profile, are apparent advantages of modified-bB.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
G. Krasopoulos, T. E. David, and S. Armstrong
Custom-tailored valved conduit for complex aortic root disease
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., January 1, 2008; 135(1): 3 - 7.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Asian Cardiovasc. Thorac. Ann.Home page
P. P Urbanski, W. Dinstak, S. Frank, A. Siebel, and R. W Hacker
Modified versus Standard Mechanical Valved Aortic Conduit
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, March 1, 2005; 13(1): 53 - 57.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
K. Kurisu, Y. Ochiai, T. Kajiwara, H. Kumeda, and R. Tominaga
A modified valve-on-valve approach for aortic root replacement
Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 2003; 76(6): 2099 - 2101.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 2001 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.